• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多通道腔内阻抗-pH 测试的观察者间一致性。

Inter-observer agreement for multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH testing.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2010 Sep;23(7):540-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01060.x. Epub 2010 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01060.x
PMID:20459441
Abstract

Twenty-four-hour ambulatory multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)-pH detects both acid and nonacid reflux (NAR). A computer-based program (Autoscan™, Sandhill Scientific, Highlands Ranch, CO, USA) automates the detection of reflux episodes, increasing the ease of study interpretation. Inter-observer agreement between multiple reviewers and with Autoscan™ for the evaluation of significant NAR with MII-pH has not been studied in the adult population. Twenty MII-pH studies on patients taking a proton pump inhibitor twice daily were randomly selected. Autoscan™ analyzed all studies using the same pre-programmed parameters. Four reviewers interpreted the MII-pH studies, adding or deleting reflux episodes detected by Autoscan™. Positive studies for NAR and total reflux episodes were based on published criteria. Cohen's kappa statistic (κ) evaluated inter-observer agreement between reviewers and Autoscan™ analysis. The average κ for pathologic NAR between reviewers was 0.57 (0.47-0.70), and between reviewers and Autoscan™ was 0.56 (0.4-0.8). When using the total reflux episode number as a marker for pathologic reflux (acid and NAR), the κ score was 0.72 (0.61-0.89) between reviewers, and 0.74 (0.53-0.9) when evaluating total reflux episodes. Two reviewers agreed more often with each other and with Autoscan™ on the number of NAR episodes, while the other two reviewers agreed with each other, but did not agree with either Autoscan™ or the first two reviewers. Inter-observer agreement between reviewers and Autoscan™ for detecting pathologic NAR is moderate, with reviewers either excluding more of the Autoscan™-defined events or excluding fewer events and therefore agreeing with Autoscan™.

摘要

24 小时动态多通道腔内阻抗-pH 检测法(MII-pH)可同时检测酸反流和非酸反流(NAR)。基于计算机的程序(AutoscanTM,美国科罗拉多州桑德希尔科学公司)自动检测反流事件,增加了研究解读的便利性。在成人人群中,尚未研究过多 reviewers 与 AutoscanTM 之间评估 MII-pH 中显著 NAR 的一致性。随机选择了 20 项接受质子泵抑制剂(PPI)每日两次治疗的患者的 MII-pH 研究。AutoscanTM 使用相同的预编程参数分析了所有研究。四位 reviewers 解释了 MII-pH 研究,并添加或删除了 AutoscanTM 检测到的反流事件。NAR 和总反流事件的阳性研究基于已发表的标准。Cohen 的kappa 统计量(κ)评估了 reviewers 与 AutoscanTM 分析之间的观察者间一致性。reviewers 之间病理性 NAR 的平均κ值为 0.57(0.47-0.70),reviewers 与 AutoscanTM 之间的平均κ值为 0.56(0.40-0.80)。当使用总反流事件数作为病理性反流(酸和 NAR)的标志物时,两位 reviewers 之间的κ评分为 0.72(0.61-0.89),而当评估总反流事件时,κ评分为 0.74(0.53-0.9)。两位 reviewers 彼此之间以及与 AutoscanTM 之间在 NAR 事件的数量上更常达成一致,而另外两位 reviewers 彼此之间达成一致,但与 AutoscanTM 或前两位 reviewers 不一致。reviewers 与 AutoscanTM 之间检测病理性 NAR 的观察者间一致性为中度,两位 reviewers 排除了更多的 AutoscanTM 定义的事件,或者排除了较少的事件,因此与 AutoscanTM 一致。

相似文献

1
Inter-observer agreement for multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH testing.多通道腔内阻抗-pH 测试的观察者间一致性。
Dis Esophagus. 2010 Sep;23(7):540-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01060.x. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
2
Twice-daily proton pump inhibitor therapy does not decrease the frequency of reflux episodes during nocturnal recumbency in patients with refractory GERD: analysis of 200 patients using multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH testing.每日两次质子泵抑制剂治疗并未降低难治性 GERD 患者夜间卧位时反流发作的频率:使用多通道腔内阻抗-pH 监测对 200 例患者的分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2012 Nov-Dec;25(8):682-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01310.x. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
3
Wireless 'mini' multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH: what is the optimal design of a miniature wireless device?无线“微型”多通道腔内阻抗- pH监测仪:微型无线设备的最佳设计是什么?
Dis Esophagus. 2014 Jul;27(5):424-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01410.x. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
4
Acid and non-acid reflux in patients with persistent symptoms despite acid suppressive therapy: a multicentre study using combined ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring.尽管进行了抑酸治疗仍有持续症状的患者的酸反流和非酸反流:一项使用联合动态阻抗-pH监测的多中心研究
Gut. 2006 Oct;55(10):1398-402. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.087668. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
5
Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH esophageal testing compared to pH alone for diagnosing both acid and weakly acidic gastroesophageal reflux.联合多通道腔内阻抗和pH值食管检测与单纯pH值检测在诊断酸性和弱酸性胃食管反流方面的比较。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Feb;5(2):172-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.11.015.
6
pH Impedance and high-resolution manometry in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease high-dose proton pump inhibitor failures.pH 阻抗和高分辨率测压在咽喉反流病高剂量质子泵抑制剂治疗失败中的应用。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Nov;122(11):2473-81. doi: 10.1002/lary.23518. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
7
Symptoms with acid and nonacid reflux may be produced by different mechanisms.酸反流和非酸反流的症状可能由不同机制产生。
Dis Esophagus. 2009;22(5):467-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00940.x. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
8
Swallow evaluation during multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH: an alternate method to assess esophageal transit.多通道腔内阻抗和 pH 值监测期间的吞咽评估:评估食管传输的替代方法。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov-Dec;45(10):862-6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31822a2c61.
9
Esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH testing in the study of apparent life threatening episode incidents in infants.食管多通道腔内阻抗和pH值检测在婴儿明显危及生命事件研究中的应用
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2014 Mar;106(3):159-64.
10
Direct measurement of gastroesophageal reflux episodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma by 24-h pH-impedance monitoring.通过 24 小时 pH 阻抗监测对鳞状细胞癌患者胃食管反流事件的直接测量。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov;106(11):1923-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.282. Epub 2011 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Superimposed Non-acid Reflux Event: An Example of When It May Be Important to Revisit the Impedance Analysis Guidelines.叠加性非酸性反流事件:一个可能需要重新审视阻抗分析指南的重要示例。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Jan 30;28(1):165-166. doi: 10.5056/jnm21172.
2
Role of the Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance in Identifying Evidence Against Pathologic Reflux in Patients With Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms as Classified by the Lyon Consensus.夜间平均基线阻抗在根据里昂共识分类的难治性胃食管反流病症状患者中识别排除病理性反流证据方面的作用
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Jan 30;28(1):121-130. doi: 10.5056/jnm20277.
3
Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Clinical Practice Guidelines: Joint Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.
《儿科胃食管反流临床实践指南:北美儿科胃肠病、肝病和营养学会与欧洲儿科胃肠病、肝病和营养学会联合推荐》
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018 Mar;66(3):516-554. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001889.
4
Impedance-pH Monitoring for Diagnosis of Reflux Disease: New Perspectives.阻抗-pH监测在反流性疾病诊断中的应用:新视角
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Aug;62(8):1881-1889. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4625-8. Epub 2017 May 26.
5
Esophageal Impedance Monitoring: Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls.食管阻抗监测:临床要点与陷阱
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep;111(9):1245-56. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.256. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
6
Discounting the duration of bolus exposure in impedance testing underestimates acid reflux.在阻抗测试中忽略推注暴露的持续时间会低估胃酸反流。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2016 Jun 8;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0471-y.
7
More art than science: impedance analysis prone to interpretation error.艺术多于科学:阻抗分析容易出现解释错误。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Jun;19(6):987-92. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2809-0. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
8
Impedance pH Monitoring: Intra-observer and Inter-observer Agreement and Usefulness of a Rapid Analysis of Symptom Reflux Association.阻抗-pH 监测:观察者内和观察者间一致性以及症状反流相关性快速分析的有用性。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Apr 30;20(2):205-11. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2014.20.2.205.