Bohnen N, Nicolson N, Sulon J, Jolles J
Department of Neuropsychology and Psychobiology, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Psychosom Res. 1991;35(2-3):141-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(91)90068-y.
The present study examined whether salivary cortisol secretion as an index of stress reactivity to continuous mental task performance reflected individual differences in coping styles. During 4 hr of continuous mental tasks significantly higher cortisol levels were found in comparison with a control session. However, individual variability in the cortisol response was high. Correlational data indicate a significant negative relationship between the coping style 'comforting cognitions' and the individual cortisol response during mental stress. During this particular type of cognitive stress, where the subject has no control over the experimental situation, comforting and emotion-focused coping may be effective because of the subject's efforts of trying to reframe the inevitable situation in a positive and self-encouraging way. In contrast, there was no significant relationship between trait anxiety and individual glucocorticoid susceptibility to mental stress.
本研究考察了作为对持续心理任务表现应激反应指标的唾液皮质醇分泌是否反映了应对方式的个体差异。在持续4小时的心理任务期间,与对照时段相比,发现皮质醇水平显著更高。然而,皮质醇反应的个体变异性很大。相关数据表明,应对方式“安慰性认知”与心理应激期间个体皮质醇反应之间存在显著负相关。在这种特殊类型的认知应激中,受试者无法控制实验情境,由于受试者努力以积极和自我鼓励的方式重新构建不可避免的情境,安慰性和以情绪为中心的应对可能是有效的。相比之下,特质焦虑与个体对心理应激的糖皮质激素易感性之间没有显著关系。