Centre for Health Policy, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3, Johannesburg, 2050, South Africa.
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 May;88(5):350-6. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.072918.
To evaluate the relative effectiveness of different policies in attracting nurses to rural areas in Kenya, South Africa and Thailand using data from a discrete choice experiment (DCE).
A labelled DCE was designed to model the relative effectiveness of both financial and non-financial strategies designed to attract nurses to rural areas. Data were collected from over 300 graduating nursing students in each country. Mixed logit models were used for analysis and to predict the uptake of rural posts under different incentive combinations.
Nurses' preferences for different human resource policy interventions varied significantly between the three countries. In Kenya and South Africa, better educational opportunities or rural allowances would be most effective in increasing the uptake of rural posts, while in Thailand better health insurance coverage would have the greatest impact.
DCEs can be designed to help policy-makers choose more effective interventions to address staff shortages in rural areas. Intervention packages tailored to local conditions are more likely to be effective than standardized global approaches.
利用离散选择实验(DCE)的数据,评估肯尼亚、南非和泰国吸引护士到农村地区的不同政策的相对效果。
设计了一个标记 DCE,以模拟旨在吸引护士到农村地区的财务和非财务策略的相对效果。数据来自每个国家的 300 多名即将毕业的护理学生。使用混合对数模型进行分析,并预测在不同激励组合下农村岗位的上岗率。
护士对不同人力资源政策干预的偏好在三个国家之间存在显著差异。在肯尼亚和南非,更好的教育机会或农村津贴将最有效地增加农村岗位的上岗率,而在泰国,更好的医疗保险覆盖范围将产生最大影响。
DCE 可用于帮助决策者选择更有效的干预措施来解决农村地区的人员短缺问题。针对当地情况定制的干预措施包比标准化的全球方法更有可能有效。