Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Jun;19(6):807-13. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0899-5. Epub 2010 May 13.
A number of prognostic factors have been identified as risk factors for chemotherapy-induced emesis. This post-hoc analysis addressed whether: (1) these prognostic factors can identify a low-risk group for whom ondansetron plus dexamethasone alone provide a high level of protection (≥80% no emesis); (2) the NK1 receptor antagonist aprepitant improves antiemetic outcome regardless of emetic risk.
Breast cancer patients in a phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were randomized to antiemetic regimens including ondansetron and dexamethasone, or aprepitant, ondansetron, and dexamethasone. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the impact on emesis (but not nausea) of the regimen with aprepitant, and previously reported risk factors, including age (<55 and ≥55 years), ethanol use (0-4 or ≥5 drinks/week), history of pregnancy-related morning sickness, and history of motion sickness, using a modified intent-to-treat approach.
Treatment with aprepitant (P < 0.0001), older age (P = 0.006), ethanol use (P = 0.0048), and no history of morning sickness (P = 0.0007) were all significantly associated with reduced likelihood of emesis. The proportion of patients with one, two, or three risk factors who remained emesis free was significantly higher with the aprepitant-containing regimen than with the active control (70.2-82.8% vs. 38.6-66.4%, respectively).
Aprepitant markedly improved control of emesis in patients with one or more risk factors. This analysis did not support using risk factors for modifying the antiemetic approach. A low-risk group with zero risk factors for whom aprepitant provided little benefit was of questionable clinical utility, since they comprised less than 3% of patients.
一些预后因素已被确定为化疗引起呕吐的危险因素。本事后分析旨在探讨以下两个问题:(1) 这些预后因素能否确定一个低危人群,对该人群单用昂丹司琼联合地塞米松即可提供高度保护(呕吐发生率<80%);(2) NK1 受体拮抗剂阿瑞匹坦是否能改善止吐效果,而与呕吐风险无关。
一项 III 期双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验纳入了乳腺癌患者,患者被随机分配至昂丹司琼和地塞米松或阿瑞匹坦、昂丹司琼和地塞米松的止吐方案。采用多变量逻辑回归模型评估阿瑞匹坦方案以及先前报道的危险因素(包括年龄<55 岁和≥55 岁、乙醇使用(0-4 或≥5 份/周)、妊娠相关晨吐史和晕车史)对呕吐(而非恶心)的影响,采用意向治疗法进行改良。
与阿瑞匹坦(P<0.0001)、年龄较大(P=0.006)、乙醇使用(P=0.0048)和无晨吐史(P=0.0007)相比,接受阿瑞匹坦治疗的患者发生呕吐的可能性显著降低。与活性对照相比,具有阿瑞匹坦的方案使具有一个、两个或三个危险因素的患者中呕吐完全缓解的比例显著升高(分别为 70.2%-82.8%和 38.6%-66.4%)。
阿瑞匹坦显著改善了具有一个或多个危险因素的患者的呕吐控制。本分析不支持使用危险因素来调整止吐方法。具有零个危险因素的低危人群接受阿瑞匹坦获益甚微,临床实用性值得怀疑,因为这类人群不到 3%。