• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Web 2.0 上的器官捐赠:YouTube 器官捐赠视频的内容和受众分析。

Organ donation on Web 2.0: content and audience analysis of organ donation videos on YouTube.

机构信息

Department of Communication, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63121, USA.

出版信息

Health Commun. 2010 Apr;25(3):238-46. doi: 10.1080/10410231003698911.

DOI:10.1080/10410231003698911
PMID:20461609
Abstract

This study examines the content of and audience response to organ donation videos on YouTube, a Web 2.0 platform, with framing theory. Positive frames were identified in both video content and audience comments. Analysis revealed a reciprocity relationship between media frames and audience frames. Videos covered content categories such as kidney, liver, organ donation registration process, and youth. Videos were favorably rated. No significant differences were found between videos produced by organizations and individuals in the United States and those produced in other countries. The findings provide insight into how new communication technologies are shaping health communication in ways that differ from traditional media. The implications of Web 2.0, characterized by user-generated content and interactivity, for health communication and health campaign practice are discussed.

摘要

这项研究运用框架理论,考察了 YouTube 这一 Web 2.0 平台上器官捐赠视频的内容和受众反应。在视频内容和受众评论中都发现了积极的框架。分析揭示了媒体框架和受众框架之间的互惠关系。视频涵盖了肾脏、肝脏、器官捐赠登记过程和青年等内容类别。视频受到了好评。在美国和其他国家制作的组织和个人视频之间没有发现显著差异。研究结果深入了解了新媒体技术如何以不同于传统媒体的方式塑造健康传播。讨论了以用户生成内容和互动为特点的 Web 2.0 对健康传播和健康运动实践的影响。

相似文献

1
Organ donation on Web 2.0: content and audience analysis of organ donation videos on YouTube.Web 2.0 上的器官捐赠:YouTube 器官捐赠视频的内容和受众分析。
Health Commun. 2010 Apr;25(3):238-46. doi: 10.1080/10410231003698911.
2
Framing life and death on YouTube: the strategic communication of organ donation messages by organ procurement organizations.在YouTube上呈现生死:器官获取组织对器官捐赠信息的策略性传播
J Health Commun. 2015;20(2):211-9. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.921741. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
3
Obesity in the new media: a content analysis of obesity videos on YouTube.新媒体中的肥胖问题:对 YouTube 肥胖视频的内容分析。
Health Commun. 2012;27(1):86-97. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.569003. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
4
When vaccines go viral: an analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on YouTube.当疫苗成为病毒:YouTube 上 HPV 疫苗接种率的分析。
Health Commun. 2012;27(5):478-85. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.610258. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
5
Content analysis of antismoking videos on YouTube: message sensation value, message appeals, and their relationships with viewer responses.YouTube 上反吸烟视频的内容分析:信息情感价值、信息诉求及其与观众反应的关系。
Health Educ Res. 2010 Dec;25(6):1085-99. doi: 10.1093/her/cyq063. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
6
An analysis of personal medical information disclosed in YouTube videos created by patients with multiple sclerosis.对多发性硬化症患者创作的YouTube视频中披露的个人医疗信息的分析。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:292-6.
7
Reduced harm or another gateway to smoking? source, message, and information characteristics of E-cigarette videos on YouTube.减少危害还是另一个吸烟入口?YouTube 电子烟视频的来源、信息和信息特征。
J Health Commun. 2014;19(5):545-60. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.821560. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
8
The presence of social support messages on YouTube videos about inflammatory bowel disease and ostomies.YouTube 视频中关于炎症性肠病和造口术的社交支持信息的存在。
Health Commun. 2012;27(5):421-8. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.606524. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
9
YouTube: a gauge of public perception and awareness surrounding epilepsy.YouTube:衡量公众对癫痫的认知和意识。
Epilepsy Behav. 2010 Apr;17(4):541-5. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
10
Ethical debate over organ donation in the context of brain death.脑死亡情况下器官捐赠的伦理争议
Bioethics. 2010 Feb;24(2):54-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00690.x. Epub 2009 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Animation to Address Disparities in Kidney Transplantation.利用动画解决肾移植中的差异问题。
Health Commun. 2024 Oct 29:1-8. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2421616.
2
Approaches to Research Ethics in Health Research on YouTube: Systematic Review.YouTube 上健康研究的研究伦理方法:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 4;25:e43060. doi: 10.2196/43060.
3
Content analysis of educational videos on hand hygiene during COVID-19 pandemic.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间手部卫生教育视频的内容分析
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Jul 30;10:278. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1024_20. eCollection 2021.
4
Interactions between emotional and cognitive engagement with science on YouTube.YouTube 上科学情感投入与认知投入的相互作用。
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Aug;30(6):759-776. doi: 10.1177/0963662521990848. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
5
A study on users' preference towards diabetes-related video clips on YouTube.YouTube 上糖尿病相关视频剪辑用户偏好的研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Feb 28;20(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1035-1.
6
How Health Communication via Tik Tok Makes a Difference: A Content Analysis of Tik Tok Accounts Run by Chinese Provincial Health Committees.如何通过抖音进行健康传播:对中国省级卫生委员会运营的抖音账号的内容分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 27;17(1):192. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010192.
7
Comparing web-based video interventions to enhance university student willingness to donate organs: A randomized controlled trial.比较基于网络的视频干预措施以增强大学生捐献器官的意愿:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Transplant. 2019 Apr;33(4):e13506. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13506. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
8
How Can Social Media Lead to Co-Production (Co-Delivery) of New Services for the Elderly Population? A Qualitative Study.社交媒体如何促成针对老年人群体的新服务的共同生产(共同交付)?一项定性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2018 Feb 12;5(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.7856.
9
The Role of Media in Non-Directed (Altruistic) Living Kidney Donation.媒体在非定向(利他性)活体肾脏捐赠中的作用。
Health Commun. 2019 Feb;34(2):259-267. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1405480. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
10
Engaging Moms on Teen Indoor Tanning Through Social Media: Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.通过社交媒体促使母亲关注青少年室内晒黑行为:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Nov 29;5(4):e228. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6624.