Suppr超能文献

美在观者心中:对抽象图像有着高度个性化的品味,但对现实世界图像则不然。

Beauty and the beholder: highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images.

作者信息

Vessel Edward A, Rubin Nava

机构信息

Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Vis. 2010 Feb 22;10(2):18.1-14. doi: 10.1167/10.2.18.

Abstract

How individual are visual preferences? For real-world scenes, there is high agreement in observer's preference ratings. This could be driven by visual attributes of the images but also by non-visual associations, since those are common to most individuals. To investigate this, we developed a set of novel abstract, visually diverse images. At the individual observer level both abstract and real-world images yielded robust and consistent visual preferences, and yet abstract images yielded much lower across observer agreement in preferences than did real-world images. This suggests that visual preferences are typically driven by the semantic content of stimuli, and that shared semantic interpretations then lead to shared preferences. Further experiments showed that highly individual preferences can nevertheless emerge also for real-world scenes, in contexts which de-emphasize their semantic associations.

摘要

视觉偏好的个体差异有多大?对于真实场景,观察者的偏好评分高度一致。这可能是由图像的视觉属性驱动的,但也可能是由非视觉联想驱动的,因为这些对大多数个体来说是共有的。为了研究这一点,我们开发了一组新颖的抽象的、视觉上多样的图像。在个体观察者层面,抽象图像和真实世界图像都产生了强烈且一致的视觉偏好,然而抽象图像在观察者之间的偏好一致性远低于真实世界图像。这表明视觉偏好通常是由刺激的语义内容驱动的,并且共享的语义解释会导致共享的偏好。进一步的实验表明,在淡化语义联想的情境中,即使是真实世界场景也可能出现高度个体化的偏好。

相似文献

2
Sensing the beauty of interface: Neural oscillatory correlates of visual aesthetic judgment.
Behav Brain Res. 2025 Jul 9;489:115623. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115623. Epub 2025 May 4.
3
Art expertise in construing meaning of representational and abstract artworks.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jan;192:11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
4
Stronger shared taste for natural aesthetic domains than for artifacts of human culture.
Cognition. 2018 Oct;179:121-131. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
7
The world can look better: enhancing beauty experience with brain stimulation.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Nov;9(11):1713-21. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst165. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
8
Predicting beauty: fractal dimension and visual complexity in art.
Br J Psychol. 2011 Feb;102(1):49-70. doi: 10.1348/000712610X498958.
9
Infant's visual preferences for facial traits associated with adult attractiveness judgements: data from eye-tracking.
Infant Behav Dev. 2014 Aug;37(3):268-75. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 May 6.
10
The Influence of Art Expertise and Training on Emotion and Preference Ratings for Representational and Abstract Artworks.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 5;10(8):e0134241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134241. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Original art paintings are chosen over their "color-rotated" versions because of changed color contrast.
Perception. 2025 Oct;54(10):780-814. doi: 10.1177/03010066251345994. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
Comparison of art preferences in patient rooms between chronic pain patients, palliative care patients and physicians.
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2025 Jun;175(9-10):237-244. doi: 10.1007/s10354-025-01086-8. Epub 2025 May 5.
3
The Beholder's Share: Bridging art and neuroscience to study individual differences in subjective experience.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Apr 15;122(15):e2413871122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2413871122. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
4
The role of art knowledge training on aesthetic judgements and executive functions.
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Feb 26;12(2):240175. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240175. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
The perceptual primacy of feeling: Affectless visual machines explain a majority of variance in human visually evoked affect.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jan 28;122(4):e2306025121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2306025121. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
6
Appreciation of singing and speaking voices is highly idiosyncratic.
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Nov 6;11(11):241623. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241623. eCollection 2024 Nov.
7
Beyond the words: Exploring individual differences in the evaluation of poetic creativity.
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 3;19(10):e0307298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307298. eCollection 2024.
8
Consensus and contention in beauty judgment.
iScience. 2024 Jun 8;27(7):110213. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110213. eCollection 2024 Jul 19.
9
Perceptual (but not acoustic) features predict singing voice preferences.
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 18;14(1):8977. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58924-9.

本文引用的文献

3
The neural basis of scene preferences.
Neuroreport. 2007 Apr 16;18(6):525-9. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328091c1f9.
4
Humans prefer curved visual objects.
Psychol Sci. 2006 Aug;17(8):645-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01759.x.
5
6
Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(4):364-82. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3.
7
A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments.
Br J Psychol. 2004 Nov;95(Pt 4):489-508. doi: 10.1348/0007126042369811.
8
Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference.
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Dec;6(12):1317-22. doi: 10.1038/nn1150. Epub 2003 Nov 9.
9
The influence of complexity and novelty in visual figures on orienting responses.
J Exp Psychol. 1958 Mar;55(3):289-96. doi: 10.1037/h0043555.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验