Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S513-26. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-100552.
Mitochondrial dysfunction and synaptic loss are among the earliest events linked to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and might play a causative role in disease onset and progression. The underlying mechanisms of mitochondrial and synaptic dysfunction in AD remain unclear. We previously reported that nitric oxide (NO) triggers persistent mitochondrial fission and causes neuronal cell death. A recent article claimed that S-nitrosylation of dynamin related protein 1 (DRP1) at cysteine 644 causes protein dimerization and increased GTPase activity and is the mechanism responsible for NO-induced mitochondrial fission and neuronal injury in AD, but not in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, this report remains controversial. To resolve the controversy, we investigated the effects of S-nitrosylation on DRP1 structure and function. Contrary to the previous report, S-nitrosylation of DRP1 does not increase GTPase activity or cause dimerization. In fact, DRP1 does not exist as a dimer under native conditions, but rather as a tetramer capable of self-assembly into higher order spiral- and ring-like oligomeric structures after nucleotide binding. S-nitrosylation, as confirmed by the biotin-switch assay, has no impact on DRP1 oligomerization. Importantly, we found no significant difference in S-nitrosylated DRP1 (SNO-DRP1) levels in brains of age-matched normal, AD, or PD patients. We also found that S-nitrosylation is not specific to DRP1 because S-nitrosylated optic atrophy 1 (SNO-OPA1) is present at comparable levels in all human brain samples. Finally, we show that NO triggers DRP1 phosphorylation at serine 616, which results in its activation and recruitment to mitochondria. Our data indicate the mechanism underlying nitrosative stress-induced mitochondrial fragmentation in AD is not DRP1 S-nitrosylation.
线粒体功能障碍和突触损失是与阿尔茨海默病(AD)相关的最早事件之一,可能在疾病的发生和进展中起因果作用。AD 中线粒体和突触功能障碍的潜在机制尚不清楚。我们之前报道过,一氧化氮(NO)引发持续的线粒体裂变,并导致神经元细胞死亡。最近的一篇文章声称,DRP1 第 644 位半胱氨酸的 S-亚硝基化导致蛋白质二聚化和 GTPase 活性增加,是 NO 诱导 AD 中线粒体裂变和神经元损伤的机制,但不是帕金森病(PD)的机制。然而,这一报告仍然存在争议。为了解决这一争议,我们研究了 S-亚硝基化对 DRP1 结构和功能的影响。与之前的报告相反,DRP1 的 S-亚硝基化不会增加 GTPase 活性或导致二聚化。事实上,DRP1 在天然状态下不存在二聚体,而是作为四聚体存在,能够在核苷酸结合后自组装成更高阶的螺旋和环形寡聚体结构。生物素转换实验证实 S-亚硝基化对 DRP1 寡聚化没有影响。重要的是,我们在年龄匹配的正常、AD 或 PD 患者的大脑中没有发现 S-亚硝基化 DRP1(SNO-DRP1)水平有显著差异。我们还发现 S-亚硝基化不是 DRP1 特异的,因为所有人类脑样本中都存在 S-亚硝基化光感受器萎缩蛋白 1(SNO-OPA1),且水平相当。最后,我们证明 NO 可引发 DRP1 丝氨酸 616 磷酸化,导致其激活并募集到线粒体。我们的数据表明,AD 中硝化应激诱导的线粒体碎片化的机制不是 DRP1 的 S-亚硝基化。