Clinic for Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Aug;21(8):781-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01927.x. Epub 2010 May 3.
The purpose of this investigation was to determine and compare the accuracy of four available mechanical torque-limiting gauges (MTLGs) for mini-screw placement.
The torque outputs of six randomly obtained MTLGs, either of the screwdriver or torque ratchet type of four mini-screw manufacturers were obtained. Mounted on a joint, a universal testing machine applied perpendicular force to a lever arm with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. For each device, 10 repetitions of the corresponding target torque level were recorded after initial sterilisation (1) and after 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 times to evaluate its potential influence on MTLGs. The breakpoints (N cm) were calculated for comparison of the groups. Descriptive statistics and mean breakpoints values for each MTLG computed and compared with the reference values indicated on the respective torque gauges provided by the producer.
The mean torque values for the AbsoAnchor MTLG devices were significantly below torque levels, but provide consistent torque values. All but one obtained values for the Spider Screw, MTLG of the screw driver type, were within the indicated moment range during the first 50-times of sterilization process. But after 100-times of steam sterilization all mean breakpoint values were relevantly higher than the indicated torque range values. Each individual MTLG produced independently constant breakpoint torque values, but differed significantly from each other. For all but the Spider Screw MTLG, the sterilisation process had a statistically significant different influence at the various breakpoint torque levels.
After application of the manufacturers' preset torque levels, significant variations were observed between individual devices. The torque output of each individual device deviated in varying degrees from target torque values and was influenced by various degrees by the sterilisation process over time.
本研究旨在确定和比较四种现有的机械扭矩限制规(MTLG)在微型螺钉植入中的准确性。
随机获得了六个微型螺钉制造商的螺丝刀或扭矩棘轮型的 MTLG,获得了其扭矩输出。安装在关节上,万能试验机以 1mm/min 的十字头速度向杠杆臂施加垂直力。对于每个设备,在初始消毒(1)后以及在 5、10、20、50 和 100 次后,记录了 10 次对应目标扭矩水平的重复,以评估其对 MTLG 的潜在影响。计算了断点(Ncm)以比较组。计算了每个 MTLG 的描述性统计和平均断点值,并与生产商提供的相应扭矩规上指示的参考值进行了比较。
AbsoAnchor MTLG 设备的平均扭矩值明显低于扭矩水平,但提供了一致的扭矩值。在第一次 50 次消毒过程中,除了一个之外,所有 Spider Screw 螺丝刀类型的 MTLG 都在指示的扭矩范围内。但在 100 次蒸汽消毒后,所有平均断点值都明显高于指示的扭矩范围值。每个单独的 MTLG 都产生独立的恒定断点扭矩值,但彼此之间存在显著差异。除了 Spider Screw MTLG 之外,消毒过程在各个断点扭矩水平上都有统计学上的显著不同影响。
在应用制造商预设的扭矩水平后,各个设备之间观察到了显著的差异。每个单独设备的扭矩输出在不同程度上偏离了目标扭矩值,并且随着时间的推移,消毒过程对其产生了不同程度的影响。