• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多利益相关者招募参与卫生服务研究:来自一线的经验教训。

Recruitment of multiple stakeholders to health services research: lessons from the front lines.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Henderson Site, 60 (G) Wing, 2nd Floor, 711 Concession Street, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 May 13;10:123. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-123.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-10-123
PMID:20465795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2880290/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-administered surveys are an essential methodological tool for health services and knowledge translation research, and engaging end-users of the research is critical. However, few documented accounts of the efforts invested in recruitment of multiple different stakeholders to one health services research study exist. Here, we highlight the challenges of recruiting key stakeholders (policy-makers, clinicians, guideline developers) to a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) funded health services research (HSR) study aimed to develop an updated and refined version of a guideline appraisal tool, the AGREE.

METHODS

Using evidence-based methods of recruitment, our goal was to recruit 192 individuals: 80 international guideline developers, 80 Canadian clinicians and 32 Canadian policy/decision-makers. We calculated the participation rate and the recruitment efficiency.

RESULTS

We mailed 873 invitation letters. Of 838 approached, our participation rate was 29%(240) and recruitment efficiency, 19%(156). One policy-maker manager did not allow policy staff to participate in the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results from this study, we suggest that future studies aiming to engage similar stakeholders in HSR over sample by at least 5 times to achieve their target sample size and allow for participant withdrawals. We need continued efforts to communicate the value of research between researchers and end-users of research (policy-makers, clinicians, and other researchers), integration of participatory research strategies, and promotion of the value of end-user involvement in research. Future research to understand methods of improving recruitment efficiency and engaging key stakeholders in HSR is warranted.

摘要

背景

自我管理的调查是卫生服务和知识转化研究的重要方法工具,让研究的最终用户参与研究至关重要。然而,很少有记录表明在招募多个不同利益相关者参与一项卫生服务研究方面投入了多少努力。在这里,我们强调了向加拿大卫生研究院(CIHR)资助的卫生服务研究(HSR)研究中招募关键利益相关者(政策制定者、临床医生、指南制定者)的挑战,该研究旨在开发指南评估工具的更新和精炼版本,即 AGREE。

方法

我们使用基于证据的招募方法,目标是招募 192 名个体:80 名国际指南制定者、80 名加拿大临床医生和 32 名加拿大政策/决策者。我们计算了参与率和招募效率。

结果

我们邮寄了 873 封邀请函。在联系的 838 人中,我们的参与率为 29%(240 人),招募效率为 19%(156 人)。一位政策制定者经理不允许政策工作人员参与研究。

结论

根据这项研究的结果,我们建议未来的研究应将目标研究人群增加至少 5 倍,以达到其目标样本量,并允许参与者退出。我们需要继续努力在研究人员和研究的最终用户(政策制定者、临床医生和其他研究人员)之间传达研究的价值,整合参与式研究策略,并宣传最终用户参与研究的价值。有必要进行未来的研究,以了解提高招募效率和吸引 HSR 关键利益相关者的方法。

相似文献

1
Recruitment of multiple stakeholders to health services research: lessons from the front lines.多利益相关者招募参与卫生服务研究:来自一线的经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 May 13;10:123. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-123.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Health researchers and policy makers involvement in knowledge translation activities in Malawi.马拉维卫生研究人员和政策制定者参与知识转化活动。
J Health Organ Manag. 2019 Jun 28;33(4):380-395. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2019-0008. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
4
How is the use of research evidence in health policy perceived? A comparison between the reporting of researchers and policy-makers.研究证据在卫生政策中的应用是如何被感知的?研究人员和政策制定者报告的比较。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 20;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0345-6.
5
Taking the pulse of the health services research community: a cross-sectional survey of research impact, barriers and support.把握卫生服务研究界的动态:一项关于研究影响、障碍与支持的横断面调查
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Feb;44(1):160-167. doi: 10.1071/AH18213.
6
Decision-makers and the usefulness of research evidence in policy implementation--a case study from Lao PDR.决策者与研究证据在政策实施中的效用——来自老挝的个案研究
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Sep;61(6):1291-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.014. Epub 2005 Mar 5.
7
Getting research to the policy table: a qualitative study with public health researchers on engaging with policy makers.将研究成果引入政策议程:一项针对公共卫生研究人员与政策制定者互动的定性研究
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Apr 30;12:E56. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140546.
8
Application of the i-PARIHS framework for enhancing understanding of interactive dissemination to achieve wide-scale improvement in Indigenous primary healthcare.应用 i-PARIHS 框架增强对互动传播的理解,以实现原住民初级医疗的广泛改善。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 29;16(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0392-z.
9
Factors affecting engagement between academic faculty and decision-makers: learnings and priorities for a school of public health.影响学术教师与决策者参与的因素:公共卫生学院的经验教训和优先事项。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 25;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0342-9.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Survey of Argentine health researchers on the use of evidence in policymaking.阿根廷健康领域研究人员关于政策制定中证据使用情况的调查。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 30;10(4):e0125711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125711. eCollection 2015.
2
Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvement.AGREE II 的发展,第 1 部分:表现、有用性和改进领域。
CMAJ. 2010 Jul 13;182(10):1045-52. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.091714. Epub 2010 May 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvement.AGREE II 的发展,第 1 部分:表现、有用性和改进领域。
CMAJ. 2010 Jul 13;182(10):1045-52. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.091714. Epub 2010 May 31.
2
Defining knowledge translation.定义知识转化。
CMAJ. 2009 Aug 4;181(3-4):165-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081229. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
3
Survey postal questionnaire: optimising response and dealing with non-response.邮寄问卷调查:优化回复率及处理无回复情况
Nurse Res. 2009;16(2):76-88. doi: 10.7748/nr2009.01.16.2.76.c6763.
4
A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians.临床医生自行开展调查的设计与实施指南。
CMAJ. 2008 Jul 29;179(3):245-52. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080372.
5
Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project.用于评估临床实践指南质量的国际评估工具的开发与验证:AGREE项目。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Feb;12(1):18-23. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.1.18.
6
Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.提高邮寄问卷的回复率:系统评价
BMJ. 2002 May 18;324(7347):1183. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183.
7
Use of a screen log to audit patient recruitment into multiple randomized trials in the intensive care unit. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.
Crit Care Med. 2000 Mar;28(3):867-71. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200003000-00042.
8
Control response proportions in population-based case-control studies in Germany.德国基于人群的病例对照研究中的对照反应比例。
Epidemiology. 1999 Mar;10(2):181-3.
9
'So much post, so busy with practice--so, no time!': a telephone survey of general practitioners' reasons for not participating in postal questionnaire surveys.“邮件太多,忙于临床工作——所以,没时间!”:一项关于全科医生不参与邮寄问卷调查原因的电话调查
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Mar;48(428):1067-9.