• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
'So much post, so busy with practice--so, no time!': a telephone survey of general practitioners' reasons for not participating in postal questionnaire surveys.“邮件太多,忙于临床工作——所以,没时间!”:一项关于全科医生不参与邮寄问卷调查原因的电话调查
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Mar;48(428):1067-9.
2
Postal surveys of physicians gave superior response rates over telephone interviews in a randomized trial.在一项随机试验中,对医生进行邮政调查的回复率高于电话访谈。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 May;59(5):521-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.009. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
3
Surveying general practitioners: does a low response rate matter?对全科医生进行调查:低回复率有关系吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Feb;47(415):91-4.
4
Surveying general practitioners: a new avenue.对全科医生进行调查:一条新途径。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Mar;20(3):319-24. doi: 10.1185/030079903125002900.
5
Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.针对全科医生的电话调查与邮寄调查:方法学考量
Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jul;44(384):297-300.
6
A survey of job satisfaction, sources of stress and psychological symptoms among general practitioners in Leeds.利兹市全科医生的工作满意度、压力来源及心理症状调查。
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Mar;48(428):1059-63.
7
Why has postal prescriber feedback no substantial impact on general practitioners' prescribing practice? A qualitative study.为何邮政处方反馈对全科医生的处方行为没有实质性影响?一项定性研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 May;58(2):133-6. doi: 10.1007/s00228-002-0455-4. Epub 2002 Apr 17.
8
General practitioners' knowledge and practice of complementary/alternative medicine and its relationship with life-styles: a population-based survey in Italy.全科医生对补充/替代医学的知识与实践及其与生活方式的关系:意大利一项基于人群的调查
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 May 15;8:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-30.
9
Changes in general practice organization: survey of general practitioners' views on the 1990 contract and fundholding.全科医疗组织的变革:全科医生对1990年合同及基金持有制看法的调查
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Feb;46(403):95-9.
10
General practitioners' attitudes to assessment of genetic risk of common disorders in routine primary care.全科医生在常规初级保健中评估常见疾病遗传风险的态度。
Clin Genet. 2009 Dec;76(6):544-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01245.x. Epub 2009 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and Enablers of Primary Healthcare Professionals in Health Research Engagement: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.初级医疗保健专业人员参与健康研究的障碍与促进因素:定性研究的系统综述
Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Mar;27(1):e70022. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70022.
2
International survey of people living with chronic conditions (PaRIS survey): effects of general practitioner non-participation on the representativeness of the Norwegian patient data.国际慢性病患者调查(PaRIS 调查):全科医生不参与对挪威患者数据代表性的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):1257. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11751-0.
3
Knowledge, attitudes, and practice of female genital mutilation and cutting: an observational cross-sectional study in English primary care (FGM/C Study).女性生殖器切割的知识、态度和实践:一项在英国初级医疗保健机构开展的观察性横断面研究(女性生殖器切割研究)
BJGP Open. 2023 Sep 19;7(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0005. Print 2023 Sep.
4
Assessment of Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge and Understanding of the Risk of Blood Typing Interference with Daratumumab: A Survey of 12 European Countries.医疗保健专业人员对达雷妥尤单抗血型检测干扰风险的知识与理解评估:一项对12个欧洲国家的调查
Adv Ther. 2021 May;38(5):2284-2293. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01685-y. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
5
Recruitment and participation of a survey in a public-private primary care setting: experience from the QUALICOPC Malaysia.在公私合作基层医疗环境中开展调查的招募和参与:来自马来西亚 QUALICOPC 的经验。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2020 Nov 20;21:e51. doi: 10.1017/S1463423620000511.
6
Occupational Physicians' Perspectives on Determinants of Employee Participation in a Randomized Controlled Musculoskeletal Health Promotion Measure: A Qualitative Study.职业医生对参与随机对照肌肉骨骼健康促进措施的员工决定因素的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 13;17(20):7445. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207445.
7
Challenges of diagnosing and managing polymyalgia rheumatica: a multi-methods study in UK general practice.诊断和管理巨细胞动脉炎的挑战:英国普通实践中的多方法研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Nov;68(676):e783-e793. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X699557.
8
Prepared for practice and equipped for employment: what do dental foundation trainers think of their trainees?为实践做好准备并为就业做好准备:牙科基础培训师如何看待他们的学员?
Br Dent J. 2018 Sep 28;225(6):549-555. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.756. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
9
A multi-modal recruitment strategy using social media and internet-mediated methods to recruit a multidisciplinary, international sample of clinicians to an online research study.采用多模式招募策略,利用社交媒体和互联网中介方法招募来自多学科、国际化的临床医生群体参与在线研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0200184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200184. eCollection 2018.
10
General practitioners in Styria - who is willing to take part in research projects and why? : A survey by the Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research.施蒂利亚州的全科医生——谁愿意参与研究项目,以及为什么?:综合实践与健康服务研究所的一项调查。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017 Nov;129(21-22):823-834. doi: 10.1007/s00508-017-1244-5. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Surveying general practitioners: does a low response rate matter?对全科医生进行调查:低回复率有关系吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Feb;47(415):91-4.
2
The effect of cash and other financial inducements on the response rate of general practitioners in a national postal study.在一项全国性邮寄研究中,现金及其他经济诱因对全科医生回应率的影响。
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Feb;47(415):87-90.
3
General practice postal surveys: a questionnaire too far?全科医疗邮政调查:问卷是否太过了?
BMJ. 1996 Sep 21;313(7059):732-3; discussion 733-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7059.732.
4
Sustaining general practice.维持全科医疗
BMJ. 1996 Mar 2;312(7030):525-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7030.525.
5
Not another questionnaire!: eliciting the views of general practitioners.不要再有调查问卷了!:征集全科医生的意见。
Fam Pract. 1995 Sep;12(3):335-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.3.335.
6
Improving the response rates in primary care research. Some methods used in a survey on stress in general practice since the new contract (1990).提高初级保健研究中的应答率。自新合同(1990年)以来在一项关于全科医疗压力的调查中使用的一些方法。
Fam Pract. 1993 Sep;10(3):342-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.3.342.
7
Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.针对全科医生的电话调查与邮寄调查:方法学考量
Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jul;44(384):297-300.
8
General practitioners' experience of research.全科医生的研究经历。
Fam Pract. 1994 Dec;11(4):418-23. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.4.418.
9
Professionals as responders: variations in and effects of response rates to questionnaires, 1961-77.作为受访者的专业人士:1961年至1977年问卷回复率的变化及其影响
Br Med J. 1978 Nov 18;2(6149):1419-21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6149.1419.

“邮件太多,忙于临床工作——所以,没时间!”:一项关于全科医生不参与邮寄问卷调查原因的电话调查

'So much post, so busy with practice--so, no time!': a telephone survey of general practitioners' reasons for not participating in postal questionnaire surveys.

作者信息

Kaner E F, Haighton C A, McAvoy B R

机构信息

Department of Primary Health Care, University of Newcastle.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Mar;48(428):1067-9.

PMID:9624749
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1410021/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Response rates by general practitioners (GPs) to postal surveys have consistently fallen, compromising the validity of this type of research. If postal survey work is to continue we need to understand GPs' reasons for not participating and respond appropriately.

AIM

To investigate GPs' reasons for not responding to postal surveys.

METHOD

A qualitative study was carried out to determine GPs reasons for not participating in postal surveys, which were drawn from a telephone survey of 276 non-responders to a postal questionnaire survey. Practitioners' comments were recorded and reasons for their non-response quantified using content analysis.

RESULTS

Primary reasons for GPs not replying to the postal survey were that questionnaires had got lost in paperwork (34%), that GPs were too busy for the extra work involved (21%), and that questionnaires were routinely 'binned' (16%). Higher practice workloads, including increased administration, meant that participation in research had become a low priority. GPs provided some suggestions for researchers that would increase their chances of questionnaires being returned.

CONCLUSIONS

Researchers need to be aware of the pressures of service general practice and to rationalize the amount of research material sent to GPs. GPs were most likely to respond to postal surveys that had a high interest factor, that involved localized research relevant to general practice, and that incorporated a personalized approach by researchers, including good-quality explanatory information.

摘要

背景

全科医生对邮寄调查问卷的回复率持续下降,影响了这类研究的有效性。如果要继续开展邮寄调查工作,我们需要了解全科医生不参与的原因并做出适当回应。

目的

调查全科医生不回复邮寄调查问卷的原因。

方法

开展了一项定性研究,以确定全科医生不参与邮寄调查的原因,这些原因来自对276名未回复邮寄问卷调查的人员进行的电话调查。记录从业者的评论,并使用内容分析法对他们不回复的原因进行量化。

结果

全科医生不回复邮寄调查问卷的主要原因是问卷在文书工作中丢失(34%)、全科医生太忙,无暇顾及额外工作(21%)以及问卷被例行“丢弃”(16%)。包括行政工作增加在内的更高的诊所工作量意味着参与研究已成为低优先级事项。全科医生为研究人员提供了一些建议,这些建议将增加问卷被返还的几率。

结论

研究人员需要意识到基层医疗服务的压力,并合理安排发送给全科医生的研究材料数量。全科医生最有可能回复那些具有高兴趣因素、涉及与基层医疗相关的本地化研究且研究人员采用个性化方法(包括高质量解释性信息)的邮寄调查问卷。