Suppr超能文献

“邮件太多,忙于临床工作——所以,没时间!”:一项关于全科医生不参与邮寄问卷调查原因的电话调查

'So much post, so busy with practice--so, no time!': a telephone survey of general practitioners' reasons for not participating in postal questionnaire surveys.

作者信息

Kaner E F, Haighton C A, McAvoy B R

机构信息

Department of Primary Health Care, University of Newcastle.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Mar;48(428):1067-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Response rates by general practitioners (GPs) to postal surveys have consistently fallen, compromising the validity of this type of research. If postal survey work is to continue we need to understand GPs' reasons for not participating and respond appropriately.

AIM

To investigate GPs' reasons for not responding to postal surveys.

METHOD

A qualitative study was carried out to determine GPs reasons for not participating in postal surveys, which were drawn from a telephone survey of 276 non-responders to a postal questionnaire survey. Practitioners' comments were recorded and reasons for their non-response quantified using content analysis.

RESULTS

Primary reasons for GPs not replying to the postal survey were that questionnaires had got lost in paperwork (34%), that GPs were too busy for the extra work involved (21%), and that questionnaires were routinely 'binned' (16%). Higher practice workloads, including increased administration, meant that participation in research had become a low priority. GPs provided some suggestions for researchers that would increase their chances of questionnaires being returned.

CONCLUSIONS

Researchers need to be aware of the pressures of service general practice and to rationalize the amount of research material sent to GPs. GPs were most likely to respond to postal surveys that had a high interest factor, that involved localized research relevant to general practice, and that incorporated a personalized approach by researchers, including good-quality explanatory information.

摘要

背景

全科医生对邮寄调查问卷的回复率持续下降,影响了这类研究的有效性。如果要继续开展邮寄调查工作,我们需要了解全科医生不参与的原因并做出适当回应。

目的

调查全科医生不回复邮寄调查问卷的原因。

方法

开展了一项定性研究,以确定全科医生不参与邮寄调查的原因,这些原因来自对276名未回复邮寄问卷调查的人员进行的电话调查。记录从业者的评论,并使用内容分析法对他们不回复的原因进行量化。

结果

全科医生不回复邮寄调查问卷的主要原因是问卷在文书工作中丢失(34%)、全科医生太忙,无暇顾及额外工作(21%)以及问卷被例行“丢弃”(16%)。包括行政工作增加在内的更高的诊所工作量意味着参与研究已成为低优先级事项。全科医生为研究人员提供了一些建议,这些建议将增加问卷被返还的几率。

结论

研究人员需要意识到基层医疗服务的压力,并合理安排发送给全科医生的研究材料数量。全科医生最有可能回复那些具有高兴趣因素、涉及与基层医疗相关的本地化研究且研究人员采用个性化方法(包括高质量解释性信息)的邮寄调查问卷。

相似文献

4
Surveying general practitioners: a new avenue.对全科医生进行调查:一条新途径。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Mar;20(3):319-24. doi: 10.1185/030079903125002900.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
General practice postal surveys: a questionnaire too far?全科医疗邮政调查:问卷是否太过了?
BMJ. 1996 Sep 21;313(7059):732-3; discussion 733-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7059.732.
4
Sustaining general practice.维持全科医疗
BMJ. 1996 Mar 2;312(7030):525-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7030.525.
8
General practitioners' experience of research.全科医生的研究经历。
Fam Pract. 1994 Dec;11(4):418-23. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.4.418.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验