• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提出好的临床研究问题并选择正确的研究设计。

Asking good clinical research questions and choosing the right study design.

机构信息

National Trauma Research Institute & Monash University, Level 6, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.

出版信息

Injury. 2010 Jul;41 Suppl 1:S3-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.04.016. Epub 2010 May 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2010.04.016
PMID:20466367
Abstract

Clinicians and researchers seek answers to clinical research questions, primarily by accessing the results of clinical research studies. This paper moves the focus of research enquiry from getting answers to developing good clinical research questions. Using worked examples, the steps involved in refining questions drawn from various sources to create 'answerable' clinical research questions using the 'PICO' principle are described. Issues to consider in prioritising clinical research questions are also identified. Theoretical and practical considerations involved in choosing the right study design for a clinical research question are then discussed using the worked examples. These include:

摘要

临床医生和研究人员通过查阅临床研究结果来寻求临床研究问题的答案。本文将研究重点从寻找答案转移到提出好的临床研究问题上。本文通过实例,描述了如何使用“PICO”原则,从不同来源提炼问题,并将其细化为“可回答”的临床研究问题。本文还确定了在优先考虑临床研究问题时需要考虑的问题。然后,本文使用实例讨论了为临床研究问题选择正确研究设计时涉及的理论和实践考虑因素。这些因素包括:

相似文献

1
Asking good clinical research questions and choosing the right study design.提出好的临床研究问题并选择正确的研究设计。
Injury. 2010 Jul;41 Suppl 1:S3-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.04.016. Epub 2010 May 13.
2
A model for integrating clinical care and basic science research, and pitfalls of performing complex research projects for addressing a clinical challenge.一个整合临床护理和基础科学研究的模型,以及在应对临床挑战时执行复杂研究项目的陷阱。
Injury. 2010 Jul;41 Suppl 1:S14-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.05.015.
3
Study designs in clinical research.临床研究中的研究设计。
Nephron Clin Pract. 2009;113(3):c218-21. doi: 10.1159/000235610. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
4
The meaning of evidence: can practitioners be researchers?
Forsch Komplementmed. 2009 Oct;16(5):343-7. doi: 10.1159/000235542. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
5
Searching the biomedical literature: research study designs and critical appraisal.检索生物医学文献:研究设计与批判性评价
Clin Lab Sci. 2008 Winter;21(1):42-8.
6
Involving clinicians in nursing research.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1990 Jul-Aug;17(4):621-3.
7
Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.文献综述:针对文化和语言背景各异群体开展焦点小组研究的注意事项
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1000-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x.
8
Clinician trialist rounds: 28. When RCT participants are lost to follow-up. Part 1: Why even a few can matter.临床研究者查房:28. 随机对照试验参与者失访时。第1部分:为何即使少数失访者也很重要。
Clin Trials. 2015 Oct;12(5):537-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597702. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
9
Clinical trials profile: professionals and sites.临床试验概况:专业人员和机构。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Sep;31(5):438-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
10
Problems in the conduct and analysis of randomized clinical trials. Are we getting the right answers to the wrong questions?随机临床试验的实施与分析中的问题。我们是否在对错误的问题给出正确的答案?
Arch Intern Med. 1992 Mar;152(3):507-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Searching the Literature: A Simple Step-Wise Process for Evidence-Based Medicine.检索文献:循证医学的简单分步流程
J Pharm Technol. 2019 Oct;35(5):225-229. doi: 10.1177/8755122519849885. Epub 2019 May 22.
2
Impact of a package of diagnostic tools, clinical algorithm, and training and communication on outpatient acute fever case management in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一套诊断工具、临床算法以及培训和沟通方案对中低收入国家门急诊急性发热病例管理的影响:一项随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2020 Nov 25;21(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04897-9.
3
Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part I: rapid review of SCI prioritisation literature.
运用结构化的证据审查和利益相关者对话流程制定脊髓损伤研究策略。第一部分:脊髓损伤优先级文献的快速审查
Spinal Cord. 2015 Oct;53(10):714-20. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.85. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
4
A look at the potential association between PICOT framing of a research question and the quality of reporting of analgesia RCTs.审视研究问题的 PICOT 框架与镇痛 RCT 报告质量之间的潜在关联。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2013 Nov 19;13(1):44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-13-44.
5
Systematic review of microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.腰椎间盘突出症显微内镜下椎间盘切除术的系统评价
Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22(11):2458-65. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2848-8. Epub 2013 Jun 23.