• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙科学生进行种植体支持的单颗牙修复的效果。一项为期10年的临床和影像学回顾性研究。

Outcome of implant-supported single-tooth replacements performed by dental students. A 10-year clinical and radiographic retrospective study.

作者信息

Bonde Mikael Juul, Stokholm Rie, Isidor Flemming, Schou Soren

机构信息

School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Spring;3(1):37-46.

PMID:20467597
Abstract

UNLABELLED

SOURCE OF SUPPORT: The study was partially supported by Nobel Biocare, Denmark.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

AIM

To evaluate the treatment outcome of implant-supported single-tooth replacements performed by dental students as part of their undergraduate dental curriculum after a mean follow-up period of 10 years (range: 7.5 to 12 years).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 51 patients were consecutively treated by dental students with 55 implants supporting single crowns. The treatment was performed under supervision of dentists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons, all with special knowledge about oral implantology. Survival of implant crown, survival of implant, probing depth, bleeding on probing and peri-implant marginal bone level change were evaluated at the end of the follow-up period. In addition, biological and technical complications during the entire follow-up period were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients with 49 implants were available at the end of the study. The survival of the implant crowns as well as the implants was 94%. The mean probing depth at patient level was 4.8 mm. The probing depth varied between 2 and 10 mm at the individual site. The mean bleeding on probing score was 0.57 at patient level and absence of bleeding around all sites of the implants was rarely observed. The mean bone level change was -0.14 mm (range: 1.2 to -1.1 mm) during the first year of loading and 0.16 mm (range: 1.4 to -1.8) after 10 years at patient level. Five episodes of peri-implant inflammation due to excess cement were registered in five patients. Moreover, a fistula was observed at two implants in two patients. Finally, five technical complications occurred in five patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Implant-supported single-tooth replacements performed by dental students as part of their undergraduate dental curriculum were characterised by high survival rates as well as few biological and technical complications. It seems acceptable to include implant therapy in the clinical undergraduate dental curriculum, provided a focus remains on straightforward cases with substantial supervision by trained dentists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons.

摘要

未标注

资助来源:本研究部分由丹麦诺贝尔生物公司资助。

利益冲突

无。

目的

评估牙科学生在本科牙科课程中进行的种植体支持单颗牙修复的治疗效果,平均随访期为10年(范围:7.5至12年)。

材料与方法

共有51名患者由牙科学生连续治疗,使用55颗种植体支持单冠修复。治疗在牙医和口腔颌面外科医生的监督下进行,他们均具有口腔种植学的专业知识。在随访期末评估种植体冠的存留率、种植体的存留率、探诊深度、探诊出血情况以及种植体周围边缘骨水平变化。此外,评估整个随访期内的生物学和技术并发症。

结果

研究结束时共有45名患者的49颗种植体可用。种植体冠和种植体的存留率均为94%。患者层面的平均探诊深度为4.8毫米。各个部位的探诊深度在2至10毫米之间变化。患者层面的平均探诊出血评分为0.57,很少观察到种植体所有部位周围均无出血情况。在加载的第一年,患者层面的平均骨水平变化为-0.14毫米(范围:1.2至-1.1毫米),10年后为0.16毫米(范围:1.4至-1.8毫米)。5名患者发生了5次因多余粘固剂导致的种植体周围炎症。此外,2名患者的2颗种植体出现了瘘管。最后,5名患者发生了5次技术并发症。

结论

牙科学生在本科牙科课程中进行的种植体支持单颗牙修复具有高存留率以及较少的生物学和技术并发症。将种植治疗纳入本科牙科临床课程似乎是可以接受的,前提是重点仍放在简单病例上,并由训练有素的牙医和口腔颌面外科医生进行大量监督。

相似文献

1
Outcome of implant-supported single-tooth replacements performed by dental students. A 10-year clinical and radiographic retrospective study.牙科学生进行种植体支持的单颗牙修复的效果。一项为期10年的临床和影像学回顾性研究。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Spring;3(1):37-46.
2
Patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcome of implant-supported single-tooth replacements performed by dental students: a retrospective evaluation 8 to 12 years after treatment.牙科学生进行的种植体支持的单颗牙修复的患者满意度和美学效果:治疗后8至12年的回顾性评估
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013 Winter;6(4):387-95.
3
Outcome of implant therapy involving localised lateral alveolar ridge and/or sinus floor augmentation: a clinical and radiographic retrospective 1-year study.涉及局限性外侧牙槽嵴和/或上颌窦底增高的种植治疗结果:一项临床和影像学回顾性1年研究。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011 Autumn;4(3):257-67.
4
A 5-year prospective study of single-tooth replacements supported by the Astra Tech implant: a pilot study.一项关于由Astra Tech种植体支持的单颗牙替换的5年前瞻性研究:一项试点研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6(1):1-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00021.x.
5
Performance of the Straumann Bone Level Implant system for anterior single-tooth replacements in augmented and nonaugmented sites: a prospective cohort study with 60 consecutive patients.Straumann 骨水平种植体系统在前牙单牙缺失中的应用:一项前瞻性队列研究,共纳入 60 例连续患者。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Aug;24(8):941-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02486.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
6
Clinical and radiographic performance of delayed-immediate single-tooth implant placement associated with peri-implant bone defects. A 2-year prospective, controlled, randomized follow-up report.与种植体周围骨缺损相关的延迟即刻单颗牙种植的临床和影像学表现。一项为期2年的前瞻性、对照、随机随访报告。
J Clin Periodontol. 2005 May;32(5):480-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00699.x.
7
A 10-year retrospective analysis of marginal bone-level changes around implants in periodontally healthy and periodontally compromised tobacco smokers.一项对牙周健康和牙周受损的吸烟人群中种植体周围边缘骨水平变化的 10 年回顾性分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jan;22(1):47-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01977.x. Epub 2010 Sep 10.
8
Immediate placement and provisionalization of single-tooth implants involving a definitive individual abutment: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study.即刻植入并临时修复单颗种植体,使用最终基台:一项临床和放射学回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jun;24(6):652-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02442.x. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
9
Immediate, early (3 weeks) and conventional loading (4 months) of single implants: Preliminary data at 1 year after loading from a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial.单颗种植体的即刻、早期(3周)和传统负重(4个月):来自一项实用多中心随机对照试验负重后1年的初步数据。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Summer;8(2):115-26.
10
A 4-year prospective clinical and radiological study of maxillary dental implants supporting single-tooth crowns using early and delayed loading protocols.一项为期4年的前瞻性临床和放射学研究,该研究针对使用早期和延迟加载方案的上颌单颗牙种植体支持单冠修复情况。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007 Dec;9(4):222-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00045.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Narrow diameter implants to replace congenital missing maxillary lateral incisors: A 1-year prospective, controlled, clinical study.小直径种植体修复先天性上颌侧切牙缺失:一项为期 1 年的前瞻性、对照、临床研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Aug;33(8):844-857. doi: 10.1111/clr.13966. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
2
A 5-year randomized controlled trial comparing zirconia-based versus metal-based implant-supported single-tooth restorations in the premolar region.一项为期 5 年的随机对照临床试验比较了在前磨牙区域使用氧化锆基和金属基种植体支持的单颗修复体。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Aug;33(8):792-803. doi: 10.1111/clr.13960. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the survival, the failure, and the complication rates of veneered and monolithic all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.
系统评价和荟萃分析评估了饰面和整体式全陶瓷种植体支持的单冠的存活率、失败率和并发症发生率。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Oct;32 Suppl 21(Suppl 21):254-288. doi: 10.1111/clr.13863.
4
Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.短种植体(6 毫米)支持的单冠修复与上颌窦底提升联合使用标准长度种植体(13 毫米)的比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Jul 16;7(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00348-5.
5
Are UK graduates equipped with the skill set required to meet the demands of the UK's edentulous population?英国的毕业生是否具备满足英国无牙颌人群需求所需的技能?
Br Dent J. 2018 Jul 13;225(1):15-18. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.524. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
6
Influence of implant location on the clinical outcomes of implant abutments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.种植体位置对种植体基台临床结果的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018 Feb 26;10:19-35. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S143910. eCollection 2018.