Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2AY, Scotland, UK.
Respir Med. 2010 Sep;104(9):1237-45. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.04.012. Epub 2010 May 15.
Recommendations in asthma guidelines presuppose that practitioners have the evidence, information, knowledge, and tools to select inhaler devices appropriate for individual patients. Randomised controlled trials usually exclude patients with suboptimal inhaler technique. There is therefore little evidence on which to base inhaler selection in the real world, where patients often use their inhalers incorrectly. The lung deposition of inhaled drug varies according to inhaler device, drug particle size, inhalation technique, and pattern of inspiratory flow. Even with training, not all patients can use their inhalers correctly and maintain inhaler technique; patients may have inability to handle the inhaler, strong negative preferences, or natural breathing patterns that do not match their prescribed inhaler. Therefore, matching device to the patient may be a better course of action than increasing therapy or training and retraining a patient to use a specific inhaler device. Several research questions require answers to meet the goal of helping prescribers make a more informed choice of inhaler type. Is the level of drug deposition in the lungs a key determinant of clinical short- and long-term outcomes? What should be measured by a clinical tool designed to check inhaler technique and therefore help with device selection? If we have a tool to help in individualising inhaler choice, will we achieve better asthma outcomes? Do we have to refine inhaler device choice for each individual, or will we get better outcomes if we select our current best option in light of current knowledge and apply this on a population level?
哮喘指南中的建议假设从业者拥有证据、信息、知识和工具,能够为每位患者选择合适的吸入器设备。随机对照试验通常排除吸入技术不佳的患者。因此,在现实世界中,几乎没有基于吸入器选择的证据,因为患者经常不正确地使用吸入器。吸入药物在肺部的沉积量取决于吸入器装置、药物颗粒大小、吸入技术和吸气流量模式。即使经过培训,并非所有患者都能正确使用吸入器并保持吸入技术;患者可能无法操作吸入器、强烈的负面偏好或与处方吸入器不匹配的自然呼吸模式。因此,将设备与患者匹配可能比增加治疗或培训以及重新培训患者使用特定吸入器设备更好。有几个研究问题需要答案,以实现帮助开处方者更明智地选择吸入器类型的目标。肺部药物沉积水平是否是临床短期和长期结果的关键决定因素?用于检查吸入技术从而有助于设备选择的临床工具应该测量什么?如果我们有工具来帮助个体化吸入器选择,我们是否会获得更好的哮喘结果?我们是否必须为每个个体细化吸入器设备选择,还是根据当前知识选择当前最佳选择并在人群水平上应用,从而获得更好的结果?