Kjome Kimberly L, Lane Scott D, Schmitz Joy M, Green Charles, Ma Liangsuo, Prasla Irshad, Swann Alan C, Moeller F Gerard
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.
Psychiatry Res. 2010 Jul 30;178(2):299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.11.024. Epub 2010 May 15.
Impulsivity and decision making are associated on a theoretical level in that impaired planning is a component of both. However, few studies have examined the relationship between measures of decision making and impulsivity in clinical populations. The purpose of this study was to compare cocaine-dependent subjects to controls on a measure of decision making (the Iowa Gambling Task or IGT), a questionnaire measure of impulsivity (the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale or BIS-11) and a measure of behavioural inhibition (the immediate memory task or IMT), and to examine the interrelationship among these measures. Results of the study showed that cocaine-dependent subjects made more disadvantageous choices on the IGT, had higher scores on the BIS and more commission errors on the IMT. Cognitive model analysis showed that choice consistency factors on the IGT differed between cocaine-dependent subjects and controls. However, there was no significant correlation between IGT performance and the BIS total score or subscales or IMT commission errors. These results suggest that in cocaine-dependent subjects there is little overlap between decision making as measured by the IGT and impulsivity/behavioural inhibition as measured by the BIS and IMT.
冲动性与决策在理论层面上存在关联,因为规划受损是两者的一个组成部分。然而,很少有研究考察临床人群中决策测量与冲动性之间的关系。本研究的目的是在决策测量(爱荷华赌博任务或IGT)、冲动性的问卷调查测量(巴拉特冲动性量表或BIS - 11)和行为抑制测量(即时记忆任务或IMT)方面,将可卡因依赖者与对照组进行比较,并考察这些测量之间的相互关系。研究结果表明,可卡因依赖者在IGT上做出更不利的选择,在BIS上得分更高,在IMT上有更多的执行错误。认知模型分析表明,可卡因依赖者与对照组在IGT上的选择一致性因素有所不同。然而,IGT表现与BIS总分或子量表或IMT执行错误之间没有显著相关性。这些结果表明,在可卡因依赖者中,通过IGT测量的决策与通过BIS和IMT测量的冲动性/行为抑制之间几乎没有重叠。