• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爱荷华赌博任务中的遗忘现象:不同参与者中的一种新计算模型。

Forgetting phenomena in the Iowa Gambling Task: a new computational model among diverse participants.

作者信息

Yang Tiancheng, Xie Chenghan, Wang Xuehe

机构信息

School of Artificial Intelligence, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.

College of Engineering, Department of Information Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 5;16:1510151. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1510151. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1510151
PMID:40538488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12177581/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is a widely used paradigm for evaluating decision-making and executive functioning, yet existing computational models seldom account for the phenomenon of forgetting, which is critical to understanding dynamic decision processes.

METHODS

We developed the Exploitation and Exploration with Forgetting (EEF) model, which integrates a dynamic forgetting parameter (λ) and participants' first-choice priors into a unified reinforcement-learning framework. The EEF model was fitted to choice data from 504 healthy individuals performing the standard 100-trial IGT. Model performance was assessed via goodness-of-fit comparisons (BIC/AIC/Free Energy), parameter- and model-recovery simulations, and behavioral validation.

RESULTS

Across multiple cohorts, the EEF model achieved superior fit relative to five established models. We introduce two novel metrics-Sequential Exploration Decay (SED) and Forgetting Interval (FI)-to quantify how forgetting shapes exploratory behavior. The EEF model's SED and FI values closely matched empirical data, and further analyses revealed systematic effects of age and gambling frequency on forgetting and decision strategies.

DISCUSSION

Our findings underscore the fundamental role of forgetting in complex decision-making environments. By explicitly modeling information decay, the EEF framework offers novel insights into cognitive dynamics across the lifespan and behavioral contexts, and provides a parsimonious yet powerful tool for future computational and empirical research.

摘要

引言

爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)是一种广泛用于评估决策和执行功能的范式,但现有的计算模型很少考虑遗忘现象,而遗忘对于理解动态决策过程至关重要。

方法

我们开发了带遗忘的利用与探索(EEF)模型,该模型将动态遗忘参数(λ)和参与者的首选先验整合到一个统一的强化学习框架中。EEF模型被拟合到504名执行标准100次试验IGT的健康个体的选择数据上。通过拟合优度比较(BIC/AIC/自由能)、参数和模型恢复模拟以及行为验证来评估模型性能。

结果

在多个队列中,EEF模型相对于五个已建立的模型实现了更好的拟合。我们引入了两个新指标——顺序探索衰减(SED)和遗忘间隔(FI)——来量化遗忘如何塑造探索行为。EEF模型的SED和FI值与实证数据紧密匹配,进一步分析揭示了年龄和赌博频率对遗忘和决策策略的系统性影响。

讨论

我们的研究结果强调了遗忘在复杂决策环境中的基本作用。通过明确模拟信息衰减,EEF框架为整个生命周期和行为背景下的认知动态提供了新的见解,并为未来的计算和实证研究提供了一个简洁而强大的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/8fecd01e7513/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/0c64e0400774/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/9cfb5268a9c9/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/37859e11d145/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/f1b0ad1d56c2/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/295c313ed487/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/83eeb089715d/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/7be2409f0254/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/78f23ab440bb/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/5b2f411f5ca0/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/8fecd01e7513/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/0c64e0400774/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/9cfb5268a9c9/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/37859e11d145/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/f1b0ad1d56c2/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/295c313ed487/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/83eeb089715d/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/7be2409f0254/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/78f23ab440bb/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/5b2f411f5ca0/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/12177581/8fecd01e7513/fpsyg-16-1510151-g0010.jpg

相似文献

1
Forgetting phenomena in the Iowa Gambling Task: a new computational model among diverse participants.爱荷华赌博任务中的遗忘现象:不同参与者中的一种新计算模型。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 5;16:1510151. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1510151. eCollection 2025.
2
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Decision making measured by the Iowa Gambling Task in alcohol use disorder and gambling disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用决策任务量表评估酒精使用障碍和赌博障碍中的决策:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Dec 1;181:152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.023. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
7
Immunogenicity and seroefficacy of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.肺炎球菌结合疫苗的免疫原性和血清效力:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jul;28(34):1-109. doi: 10.3310/YWHA3079.
8
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
9
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-term memory, attention, and temporal orientation as predictors of the cognitive impairment in older adults: A cross-sectional observational study.短期记忆、注意力和时间定向对老年人认知障碍的预测作用:一项横断面观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 20;16(12):e0261313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261313. eCollection 2021.
2
Decision Making: a Theoretical Review.决策制定:理论综述。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2022 Sep;56(3):609-629. doi: 10.1007/s12124-021-09669-x. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
3
Individual differences in learning during decision-making may predict specific harms associated with gambling.
决策过程中学习的个体差异可能预示着与赌博相关的特定危害。
Addict Behav. 2020 Nov;110:106496. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106496. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
4
Playing Mahjong for 12 Weeks Improved Executive Function in Elderly People With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Study of Implications for TBI-Induced Cognitive Deficits.打麻将12周可改善轻度认知障碍老年人的执行功能:一项关于对创伤性脑损伤所致认知缺陷影响的研究
Front Neurol. 2020 Mar 27;11:178. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00178. eCollection 2020.
5
Effect of board game activities on cognitive function improvement among older adults in adult day care centers.棋盘游戏活动对成人日托中心老年人认知功能改善的影响。
Soc Work Health Care. 2019 Oct;58(9):825-838. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2019.1656143. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
6
The forgotten part of memory.记忆中被遗忘的部分。
Nature. 2019 Jul;571(7766):S12-S14. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02211-5.
7
Sequential exploration in the Iowa gambling task: Validation of a new computational model in a large dataset of young and old healthy participants.序贯探索在爱荷华赌博任务中的应用:一种新的计算模型在年轻和老年健康参与者大样本中的验证。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Jun 13;15(6):e1006989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006989. eCollection 2019 Jun.
8
The Outcome-Representation Learning Model: A Novel Reinforcement Learning Model of the Iowa Gambling Task.结果表现学习模型:一种新的强化学习模型在爱荷华赌博任务中的应用。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Nov;42(8):2534-2561. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12688. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
9
Association of Daily Intellectual Activities With Lower Risk of Incident Dementia Among Older Chinese Adults.日常智力活动与中国老年成年人痴呆症发病率降低的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 1;75(7):697-703. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0657.
10
Why Forget? On the Adaptive Value of Memory Loss.为何遗忘?记忆丧失的适应价值。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Sep;10(5):551-78. doi: 10.1177/1745691615596787.