Mayo D J, Rose A M, Matchett S E, Hoppe P A, Solomon J M, McCurdy K K
American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC.
Transfusion. 1991 Jun;31(5):466-74. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1991.31591263204.x.
Even though all blood donated for transfusion is tested for the presence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibodies, there exists a period of time after infection by the virus before these antibodies can be detected. Blood donated during this window period is capable of transmitting the virus. Therefore, the blood of persons who are at risk for acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) should not enter the blood supply. Over a period of 4 months, 6573 potential blood donors who entered fixed and mobile blood collection sites in two cities were exposed to alternative interventions the aim of which was to exclude persons at risk for AIDS. We compared the interventions to one another and to existing materials in terms of the numbers of at-risk persons who did or did not donate for transfusion, the amount of attention paid to the materials, the scores on a comprehension test, and the self-reports by the subjects of attitudes towards the various interventions. At-risk donors who were asked direct AIDS risk behavior questions in addition to the current health history questions were more likely to be screened out than those who underwent alternative health history interviews (p less than 0.01). Potential donors paid more attention to the experimental brochures than to the experimental video or current materials (p less than 0.05). Comprehension scores were better for the new brochure and the video than for the current brochure (p less than 0.05). Donors were not offended by the experimental interventions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
尽管所有用于输血的捐献血液都要检测是否存在人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)抗体,但在病毒感染后到这些抗体能够被检测出来之间存在一段时间。在此窗口期捐献的血液能够传播病毒。因此,有获得性免疫缺陷综合征(AIDS)风险的人的血液不应进入供血系统。在4个月的时间里,6573名进入两个城市的固定和流动采血点的潜在献血者接受了替代干预措施,其目的是排除有AIDS风险的人。我们在有或没有为输血而献血的有风险人员数量、对这些材料的关注程度、理解测试的分数以及受试者对各种干预措施的态度自我报告方面,将这些干预措施相互比较,并与现有材料进行比较。除了当前的健康史问题外还被问到直接的AIDS风险行为问题的有风险献血者,比那些接受替代健康史访谈的献血者更有可能被筛查出来(p小于0.01)。潜在献血者对实验手册的关注多于实验视频或现有材料(p小于0.05)。新手册和视频的理解分数比当前手册更好(p小于0.05)。献血者没有因实验性干预措施而感到被冒犯。(摘要截短为250字)