Suppr超能文献

颅基底从青春期到成年的纵向生长变化。不同叠加方法的比较。

Longitudinal growth changes of the cranial base from puberty to adulthood. A comparison of different superimposition methods.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University of Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2010 Jul;80(4):537-44. doi: 10.2319/080709-447.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the stability of cranial reference landmarks from puberty through adulthood and to compare the displacement of these landmarks among the superimposition methods of Björk, Ricketts, Steiner, and the proposed tuberculum sella-wing (T-W) reference line.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sample consisted of serial lateral cephalometric radiographs of 30 Class II division 1 patients taken at the pretreatment (T1; mean age, 11.98 years), posttreatment (T2; mean age, 15.32 years) and postretention (T3; mean age, 32.12 years) periods. All cephalometric radiographs were superimposed at the cranial base according to the overall superimposition methods of Björk, Ricketts, Steiner, and the T-W method. The horizontal and vertical displacements of cranial landmarks (nasion, wing, tuberculum sella, sella, basion, and pterygomaxillare) were assessed by paired t-test according to Björk's structural method. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparison of the displacement of cranial landmarks among the superimposition methods.

RESULTS

The tuberculum sella and wing were the most stable cranial landmarks of the cranial base. The stability of sella and pterygomaxillare points were somewhat questionable. Nasion and basion were highly variable. The displacements of all cranial landmarks were similar between the Björk and T-W methods in all study periods. Most of the cranial landmarks displaced similarly in the horizontal direction among the methods. Vertically, the behaviors of the cranial landmarks were frequently different.

CONCLUSIONS

T-W is the most similar superimposition method to Björk's structural method; thus, it is a reliable method for examining overall facial changes.

摘要

目的

研究颅部参考标志从青春期到成年的稳定性,并比较 Björk、Ricketts、Steiner 叠加法和提出的蝶鞍翼突(T-W)参考线这 4 种叠加方法中这些标志的位移。

材料与方法

该样本由 30 例安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错(牙合)患者的系列头颅侧位片组成,这些患者分别在治疗前(T1;平均年龄 11.98 岁)、治疗后(T2;平均年龄 15.32 岁)和保持后(T3;平均年龄 32.12 岁)期拍摄头颅侧位片。所有头颅侧位片均根据 Björk、Ricketts、Steiner 的整体叠加法和 T-W 法叠加到颅基底部。根据 Björk 的结构法,采用配对 t 检验评估颅部标志(前鼻棘、翼突、蝶鞍、鞍结节、髁突和翼突外侧板)的水平和垂直位移。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)比较叠加方法中颅部标志的位移。

结果

蝶鞍和翼突是颅基底部最稳定的颅部标志。鞍结节和翼突外侧板的稳定性有些可疑。前鼻棘和髁突是高度可变的。在所有研究期,Björk 和 T-W 方法之间所有颅部标志的位移均相似。在水平方向上,各方法之间大多数颅部标志的位移相似。在垂直方向上,颅部标志的行为常常不同。

结论

T-W 是与 Björk 结构法最相似的叠加法,因此它是一种检查整体面型变化的可靠方法。

相似文献

2
The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
Angle Orthod. 2003 Aug;73(4):374-80. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0374:TDOCRL>2.0.CO;2.
4
Cephalometric superimposition on the cranial base: a review and a comparison of four methods.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987 May;91(5):403-13. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90393-3.
5
A Superimposition-Based Cephalometric Method to Quantitate Craniofacial Changes.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 14;18(10):5260. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105260.
6
Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 May-Jun;20(3):29-36. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.029-036.oar.
7
The validity of two methods of mandibular superimposition: a comparison with tantalum implants.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Mar;113(3):263-70. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70295-1.
8
The accuracy of cephalometric tracing superimposition.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Feb;64(2):194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.10.028.
10
Evaluation of extraction and non-extraction treatment effects by two different superimposition methods.
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Dec;33(6):691-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq143. Epub 2011 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

5
Effects of Type and Amount of Orthodontic Tooth Movement on Digital Model Superimposition Accuracy.
Turk J Orthod. 2021 Dec;34(4):220-226. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.20146.
6
Skeletal and Dental Effects of Twin-Block Appliances in Patients Treated With or Without Expansion.
Turk J Orthod. 2021 Sep;34(3):155-162. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.20103.
8
A Superimposition-Based Cephalometric Method to Quantitate Craniofacial Changes.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 14;18(10):5260. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105260.
9
Tau Angle: A New Approach for Assessment of True Sagittal Maxillomandibular Relationship.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Sep-Oct;13(5):497-500. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1832.
10
Evaluation of an automated superimposition method for computer-aided cephalometrics.
Angle Orthod. 2020 May 1;90(3):390-396. doi: 10.2319/071319-469.1.

本文引用的文献

1
The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
Angle Orthod. 2003 Aug;73(4):374-80. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0374:TDOCRL>2.0.CO;2.
2
Craniofacial growth and skeletal maturation: a mixed longitudinal study.
Eur J Orthod. 2001 Aug;23(4):355-61. doi: 10.1093/ejo/23.4.355.
3
A comparison of three superimposition methods.
Eur J Orthod. 1999 Dec;21(6):717-25. doi: 10.1093/ejo/21.6.717.
4
Interrelationships of brain, cranial base and mandible.
Cranio. 1998 Oct;16(4):267-74. doi: 10.1080/08869634.1998.11746067.
5
The spheno-occipital synchondrosis: the missing link between the profession's concept of craniofacial growth and orthodontic treatment.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Dec;114(6):709-12; discussion 713-4. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70204-5.
6
Condylar growth and glenoid fossa displacement during childhood and adolescence.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Apr;113(4):437-42. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)80016-4.
7
Comment on superimposition techniques.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jun;107(6):17A-18A.
8
Mandibular skeletal changes induced by early functional treatment of Class III malocclusion: a superimposition study.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Nov;108(5):525-32. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70053-6.
9
The postnatal development of the palatomaxillary region studied on human autopsy material.
Am J Orthod. 1982 Oct;82(4):329-42. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90467-5.
10
The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements.
Am J Orthod. 1983 May;83(5):382-90. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(83)90322-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验