Center for Translational Psychiatry, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Schizophr Res. 2010 Jul;120(1-3):95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.04.007. Epub 2010 May 18.
Despite the controversy surrounding the possible causal link between cannabis use and the onset of schizophrenia (SZ), data seeking to elucidate the effect of cannabis use disorders (CUDs) on the clinical presentation of SZ have produced mixed results. Although several studies have suggested that CUD in patients with SZ may be associated with variation in cognitive function, clinical presentation and course of illness, the effects have been inconsistent.
We retrospectively ascertained a large cohort (N=455) of SZ patients with either no history of a CUD (CUD-; N=280) or a history of CUD (CUD+; N=175). The groups were initially compared on key demographic variables including sex, race, age, age at onset of SZ, parental socioeconomic status, premorbid IQ, education level and global assessment of functioning. Covarying for any observed differences in demographic variables, we then compared groups on lifetime measures of psychotic symptoms as well as a brief battery of neurocognitive tests.
Compared to the CUD- group the CUD+ group demonstrated significantly better performance on measures of processing speed (Trail Making Tests A and B), verbal fluency (animal naming) and verbal learning and memory (California Verbal Learning Test). Moreover, the CUD+ group had better GAF scores than the CUD group.
Collectively, these findings suggest that SZ patients with comorbid CUD may represent a higher functioning subgroup of SZ. Future prospective studies are needed to elucidate the nature of this relationship.
尽管大麻使用与精神分裂症(SZ)发病之间可能存在因果关系的争议,但寻求阐明大麻使用障碍(CUD)对 SZ 临床表现影响的数据得出的结果却喜忧参半。尽管有几项研究表明,SZ 患者的 CUD 可能与认知功能、临床表现和病程的变化有关,但这些影响并不一致。
我们回顾性确定了一个包含 455 名 SZ 患者的大队列(无 CUD 史的患者为 CUD-;N=280;有 CUD 史的患者为 CUD+;N=175)。首先比较两组关键的人口统计学变量,包括性别、种族、年龄、SZ 发病年龄、父母社会经济地位、发病前智商、教育程度和总体功能评估。在对任何观察到的人口统计学变量差异进行协方差分析后,我们比较了两组的终生精神病症状和简短的神经认知测试结果。
与 CUD-组相比,CUD+组在处理速度(Trail Making Tests A 和 B)、语言流畅性(动物命名)和语言学习及记忆(加利福尼亚语言学习测验)方面的表现明显更好。此外,CUD+组的 GAF 评分高于 CUD 组。
总的来说,这些发现表明,患有共病 CUD 的 SZ 患者可能代表了一个具有更高功能的 SZ 亚组。需要进一步开展前瞻性研究来阐明这种关系的本质。