British Heart Foundation National Centre for Physical Activity and Health, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK.
Br J Sports Med. 2011 Mar;45(3):203-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.068395. Epub 2010 May 19.
To develop and test a new single-item physical activity screening tool, suitable for assessing respondents' eligibility for behaviour change interventions.
Two single-item assessment tools were developed, one using a "past week" recall period, the other using a "past month" recall period. A quota sampling system was used to recruit 480 adults from across England, Scotland and Wales. Half the sample completed the past-week question and half completed the past-month version. Test-retest reliability was assessed over a 2- to 5-day period. Concurrent validity was assessed using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire and the UK Active People Survey. All surveys were completed via telephone interviews.
Both versions of the single-item instrument demonstrated strong reproducibility (r=0.72-0.82), using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. The past-week recall question showed strong agreement in the classification of respondents meeting the current physical activity recommendation (kappa=0.63, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.72).Concurrent validity over the past week compared to the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire was modest (r=0.53) and slightly weaker for the past month compared to the Active People Survey (r=0.33-0.48).
Both versions of the new single-item measure performed as well as other short physical activity tools in terms of reliability and concurrent validity. Criterion validity testing of the single-item measure is recommended to establish its ability to assess objectively measured physical activity levels. In addition, further research to assess the responsiveness of the single-item measure in detecting changes in physical activity will inform its usefulness in programme evaluation.
开发和测试一种新的单项体力活动筛查工具,适用于评估受访者是否有资格接受行为改变干预。
开发了两种单项评估工具,一种使用“过去一周”的回忆期,另一种使用“过去一个月”的回忆期。采用配额抽样系统从英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士各地招募了 480 名成年人。样本的一半完成了过去一周的问题,另一半完成了过去一个月的版本。在 2 到 5 天的时间内评估了测试-重测信度。使用全球体力活动问卷和英国活跃人群调查评估了同时效度。所有调查都是通过电话访谈完成的。
两种单项工具的版本都表现出很强的可重复性(Spearman 秩相关系数为 0.72-0.82)。过去一周的回忆问题在符合当前体力活动建议的受访者分类方面显示出很强的一致性(kappa=0.63,95%置信区间 0.54 至 0.72)。与全球体力活动问卷相比,过去一周的同时效度较高(r=0.53),而与活跃人群调查相比,过去一个月的同时效度稍弱(r=0.33-0.48)。
新的单项测量工具的两种版本在可靠性和同时效度方面与其他短期体力活动工具一样好。建议对单项测量进行标准有效性测试,以确定其评估客观测量的体力活动水平的能力。此外,进一步研究检测单项测量在检测体力活动变化方面的反应能力,将为其在项目评估中的有用性提供信息。