Suppr超能文献

比较 Eragen Multi-Code 呼吸道病毒检测试剂盒与常规病毒检测和实时多重 PCR 检测试剂盒在呼吸道病毒检测中的应用。

Comparison of the Eragen Multi-Code Respiratory Virus Panel with conventional viral testing and real-time multiplex PCR assays for detection of respiratory viruses.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jul;48(7):2387-95. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00220-10. Epub 2010 May 19.

Abstract

High-throughput multiplex assays for respiratory viruses are an important step forward in diagnostic virology. We compared one such assay, the PLx Multi-Code Respiratory Virus Panel (PLx-RVP), manufactured by Eragen Biosciences, Inc. (Madison, WI), with conventional virologic testing, consisting of fluorescent-antibody staining plus testing with the R-mix system and fibroblast tube cultures. The test set consisted of 410 archived respiratory specimens, mostly nasopharyngeal swabs, including 210 that had been positive by conventional testing for a balanced selection of common respiratory viruses. Specimens yielding discrepant results were evaluated using a panel of respiratory virus PCR assays developed, characterized, and validated with clinical specimens. PLx-RVP increased the total rate of detection of viruses by 35.8%, and there was a 25.7% increase in the rate of detection of positive specimens. Reference PCR assay results corroborated the PLx-RVP result for 54 (82%) of 66 discrepancies with conventional testing. Of the 12 specimens with discrepancies between PLx-RVp and the reference PCRs, 6 were positive for rhinovirus by PLx-RVP and the presence of rhinovirus was confirmed by nucleotide sequencing. The remaining six specimens included five in which the PLx-RVP failed to detect parainfluenza virus and one in which the detection of influenza A virus by PLx-RVP could not be confirmed by the reference PCR. Taking the results of the reference PCR assay results into account, the sensitivities of the PLx-RVP for individual viruses ranged from 94 to 100% and the specificities ranged from 99 to 100%. We conclude that PLx-RVP is a highly accurate system for the detection of respiratory viruses and significantly improves the rate of detection of these viruses compared to that by conventional virologic testing.

摘要

高通量多重呼吸道病毒检测是诊断病毒学的重要进展。我们比较了一种这样的检测方法,即 Eragen Biosciences, Inc.(威斯康星州麦迪逊)制造的 PLx Multi-Code Respiratory Virus Panel(PLx-RVP),与常规病毒学检测方法,包括荧光抗体染色加 R-mix 系统检测和纤维母细胞管培养。测试集由 410 份存档的呼吸道标本组成,主要是鼻咽拭子,其中 210 份经常规检测为常见呼吸道病毒的平衡选择呈阳性。对产生不一致结果的标本使用一组开发的呼吸道病毒 PCR 检测进行评估,这些检测使用临床标本进行了特征描述和验证。PLx-RVP 提高了病毒总检出率 35.8%,阳性标本检出率提高了 25.7%。参考 PCR 检测结果证实了与常规检测的 54(82%)个差异中 PLx-RVP 的结果。在 PLx-RVP 与参考 PCR 之间存在差异的 12 个标本中,6 个标本通过 PLx-RVP 检测为鼻病毒阳性,鼻病毒的存在通过核苷酸测序得到证实。其余六个标本包括五个 PLx-RVP 未能检测到副流感病毒的标本,以及一个 PLx-RVP 检测到的流感 A 病毒无法通过参考 PCR 确认的标本。考虑到参考 PCR 检测结果,PLx-RVP 对个别病毒的敏感性范围为 94%至 100%,特异性范围为 99%至 100%。我们得出结论,PLx-RVP 是一种用于检测呼吸道病毒的高度准确的系统,与常规病毒学检测相比,它显著提高了这些病毒的检出率。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Research Progress of Coronavirus Based on Bibliometric Analysis.基于文献计量分析的冠状病毒研究进展。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 26;17(11):3766. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113766.
5
Virological and Immunological Outcomes of Coinfections.病毒学和免疫学的合并感染结果。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018 Jul 5;31(4). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00111-17. Print 2018 Oct.
10
Review of Non-Bacterial Infections in Respiratory Medicine: Viral Pneumonia.呼吸医学中的非细菌感染综述:病毒性肺炎
Arch Bronconeumol. 2015 Nov;51(11):590-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2015.02.015. Epub 2015 May 7.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验