Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Mar-Apr;18(2):186-93. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000200014.
This in situ study evaluated the discriminatory power and reliability of methods of dental plaque quantification and the relationship between visual indices (VI) and fluorescence camera (FC) to detect plaque.
Six volunteers used palatal appliances with six bovine enamel blocks presenting different stages of plaque accumulation. The presence of plaque with and without disclosing was assessed using VI. Images were obtained with FC and digital camera in both conditions. The area covered by plaque was assessed. Examinations were done by two independent examiners. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Kappa tests to compare different conditions of samples and to assess the inter-examiner reproducibility.
Some methods presented adequate reproducibility. The Turesky index and the assessment of area covered by disclosed plaque in the FC images presented the highest discriminatory powers.
The Turesky index and images with FC with disclosing present good reliability and discriminatory power in quantifying dental plaque.
本原位研究评估了几种牙菌斑定量方法的区分能力和可靠性,以及视觉指数(VI)和荧光相机(FC)检测牙菌斑的关系。
6 名志愿者使用带有 6 个牛牙釉质块的腭设备,这些釉质块呈现出不同程度的菌斑堆积。使用 VI 评估有和无显影剂时的菌斑存在情况。在两种情况下均使用 FC 和数码相机获取图像。评估菌斑覆盖的面积。由两名独立的检查者进行检查。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Kappa 检验对不同样本条件进行数据分析,以评估检查者间的可重复性。
一些方法具有良好的可重复性。Turesky 指数和 FC 图像中显影剂覆盖面积的评估具有最高的区分能力。
Turesky 指数和 FC 图像显影显示出良好的可靠性和区分能力,可用于定量牙菌斑。