Smith R N, Brook A H, Elcock C
Department of Child Dental Health, University of Sheffield, School of Clinical Dentistry, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, UK.
J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Dec;28(12):1158-62. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.281211.x.
Established clinical indices used to measure dental plaque have limitations. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new method of quantitative plaque measurement, with increased sensitivity and reproducibility, using a purpose designed image analysis system.
After plaque disclosure, the patient was positioned in a cephalometric head holder mounted in a custom-built frame with standard lighting and camera position. A 32-bit Digital Camera grabbed the image of the patient's teeth, which was analysed using Adobe Photoshop (V5.02, Adobe Systems Ltd, Europe) and Image Pro Plus software (V4.0, Media Cybernetics, USA). Measurements were made on 120 incisors in 15 patients and reproducibility was assessed using Fliess' Coefficient of Reliability. Sensitivity was assessed by comparison of results of treatment effects from a clinical trial involving 30 patients. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the image analysis system with the Turesky modification of the Quigley and Hein plaque index and the Addy plaque area index.
The results were within the 'Excellent Reliability' category, for inter-operator reproducibility and intra-operator repeatability.
This new system provided accurate quantitative measurements of dental plaque and labial tooth surfaces and was shown to have increased sensitivity when compared with the Turesky modification of the Quigley and Hein plaque index and the Addy plaque area index. The stored images can be re-measured for reliability and comparability between studies.
用于测量牙菌斑的既定临床指标存在局限性。本研究的目的是开发并评估一种新的牙菌斑定量测量方法,该方法使用专门设计的图像分析系统,具有更高的灵敏度和可重复性。
在牙菌斑染色后,将患者置于安装在定制框架中的头颅测量头托上,保持标准照明和相机位置。一台32位数码相机拍摄患者牙齿的图像,使用Adobe Photoshop(版本5.02,Adobe Systems Ltd,欧洲)和Image Pro Plus软件(版本4.0,Media Cybernetics,美国)进行分析。对15名患者的120颗切牙进行测量,并使用弗利斯可靠性系数评估可重复性。通过比较一项涉及30名患者的临床试验的治疗效果结果来评估灵敏度。使用协方差分析将图像分析系统与Quigley和Hein菌斑指数的Turesky改良版以及Addy菌斑面积指数进行比较。
对于操作者间的可重复性和操作者内的重复性,结果属于“极佳可靠性”类别。
这个新系统能够对牙菌斑和唇面牙齿表面进行准确的定量测量,并且与Quigley和Hein菌斑指数的Turesky改良版以及Addy菌斑面积指数相比,显示出更高的灵敏度。存储的图像可以重新测量以确保研究之间的可靠性和可比性。