Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jun;58(6):1058-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02863.x. Epub 2010 May 7.
Determine the effect of fecal incontinence (FI) on healthcare providers' decisions to refer patients for nursing home (NH) placement.
Survey.
Questionnaires were e-mailed to participants' homes or offices. Participants could also volunteer at the 2008 American Geriatric Society annual meeting in Washington, DC.
Two thousand randomly selected physician members and all 181 nurse practitioner members of the American Geriatrics Society were surveyed.
The survey presented a clinical scenario of a 70-year-old woman ready for discharge from a hospital and asked about the likelihood of making a NH referral if the patient had no incontinence, urinary incontinence (UI) alone, or FI. Subsequent questions modified the clinical situation to include other conditions that might affect the decision to refer. A second survey of respondents to Survey 1 addressed possible moderators of the decision to refer (e.g., family caregiver presence, diarrhea or constipation, other physical or psychiatric limitations). Significance of differences in the relative risk (RR) for NH referral was tested using the chi-square test.
Seven hundred sixteen members (24.7% response rate) completed the first survey, and 686 of the 716 (96%) completed the second. FI increased the likelihood of NH referral (RR=4.71, P<.001) more than UI did (RR=1.90, P<.001). Mobility restrictions, cognitive decline, and multiple chronic illnesses increased the likelihood of NH referral more than FI alone (P<.001 for each), but in all scenarios, adding FI further increased the likelihood of referral (P<.001). Having family caregivers willing to help with toileting attenuated the likelihood of referral.
FI increases the probability that geriatricians will refer to a NH. More-aggressive outpatient treatment of FI might delay or prevent NH referral, improve quality of life, and reduce healthcare costs.
确定粪便失禁(FI)对医疗保健提供者决定将患者转介到疗养院(NH)的影响。
调查。
向参与者的家庭或办公室发送电子邮件问卷。参与者也可以自愿参加在华盛顿特区举行的 2008 年美国老年医学会年会。
对 2000 名随机选择的美国老年医学会医师成员和所有 181 名执业护士成员进行了调查。
调查提出了一位 70 岁女性准备从医院出院的临床情况,并询问如果患者没有失禁、仅尿失禁(UI)或 FI,是否有可能转介到 NH。后续问题修改了临床情况,包括可能影响转介决定的其他情况。对调查 1 的受访者进行的第二次调查解决了转介决策的可能调节因素(例如,家庭照顾者的存在、腹泻或便秘、其他身体或精神限制)。使用卡方检验测试相对风险(RR)对 NH 转介的差异的显著性。
716 名成员(24.7%的回复率)完成了第一次调查,其中 686 名(96%)完成了第二次调查。FI 比 UI(RR=1.90,P<.001)更有可能增加 NH 转介的可能性(RR=4.71,P<.001)。行动受限、认知能力下降和多种慢性疾病比 FI 单独增加 NH 转介的可能性更大(每种情况 P<.001),但在所有情况下,添加 FI 会进一步增加转介的可能性(P<.001)。有愿意帮助进行如厕的家庭照顾者会降低转介的可能性。
FI 增加了老年病学家将患者转介到 NH 的概率。更积极的 FI 门诊治疗可能会延迟或预防 NH 转介,提高生活质量并降低医疗保健成本。