Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jun;58(6):1104-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02855.x. Epub 2010 May 7.
To evaluate the effectiveness of crash history, family concerns, clinical condition, and cognitive function (the 4Cs, an interview-based screening tool for health providers working with older drivers) in identifying at-risk older drivers.
Retrospective cohort study.
Clinical driving evaluation program at a teaching hospital in the United States.
One hundred sixty patients who completed comprehensive driving evaluations between 2003 and 2009.
Medical record information was used to identify component and total 4Cs scores. Other measurements included the Trail Making Test, the Mini-Mental State Examination, and brake reaction time. The outcome variable was performance on a 45-minute road test.
Fifty participants passed the road test, 67 failed, and 43 demonstrated marginal driving skills. The relationship between 4Cs scores and road test outcome was statistically significant (P<.001). The domains most strongly associated with road test outcome were cognitive function (P<.001) and family concerns (P=.01). Scores of 9 or greater-on the 4Cs identified 84% of participants who were at risk for poor road test performance.
The 4Cs, an interview based screening tool, may be a useful marker to identify at-risk older drivers.
评估事故史、家庭关注、临床状况和认知功能(4Cs,一种供从事老年驾驶员工作的医疗保健提供者使用的基于访谈的筛查工具)在识别高风险老年驾驶员中的有效性。
回顾性队列研究。
美国一所教学医院的临床驾驶评估计划。
2003 年至 2009 年间完成全面驾驶评估的 160 名患者。
使用病历信息确定 4Cs 各项和总分。其他测量包括连线测试、简易精神状态检查和刹车反应时间。结局变量是 45 分钟道路测试的表现。
50 名参与者通过了道路测试,67 名失败,43 名表现出边缘驾驶技能。4Cs 评分与道路测试结果之间存在统计学显著关系(P<.001)。与道路测试结果最密切相关的领域是认知功能(P<.001)和家庭关注(P=.01)。4Cs 评分达到 9 分或以上,可识别出 84%的道路测试表现不佳的高风险参与者。
4Cs,一种基于访谈的筛查工具,可能是识别高风险老年驾驶员的有用标志物。