Suppr超能文献

解读视觉与驾驶相关文献的路线图。

A roadmap for interpreting the literature on vision and driving.

作者信息

Owsley Cynthia, Wood Joanne M, McGwin Gerald

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

School of Optometry and Vision Science and Institute for Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Surv Ophthalmol. 2015 May-Jun;60(3):250-62. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Feb 7.

Abstract

Over the past several decades there has been a sharp increase in the number of studies focused on the relationship between vision and driving. The intensified attention to this topic has most likely been stimulated by the lack of an evidence basis for determining vision standards for driving licensure and a poor understanding about how vision impairment impacts driver safety and performance. Clinicians depend on the literature on vision and driving to advise visually impaired patients appropriately about driving fitness. Policy makers also depend on the scientific literature in order to develop guidelines that are evidence-based and are thus fair to persons who are visually impaired. Thus it is important for clinicians and policy makers alike to understand how various study designs and measurement methods should be interpreted so that the conclusions and recommendations they make are not overly broad, too narrowly constrained, or even misguided. We offer a methodological framework to guide interpretations of studies on vision and driving that can also serve as a heuristic for researchers in the area. Here, we discuss research designs and general measurement methods for the study of vision as they relate to driver safety, driver performance, and driver-centered (self-reported) outcomes.

摘要

在过去几十年里,专注于视力与驾驶之间关系的研究数量急剧增加。对这一主题关注度的提高,很可能是由于缺乏确定驾驶执照视力标准的证据基础,以及对视力障碍如何影响驾驶员安全和驾驶表现的理解不足。临床医生依靠有关视力与驾驶的文献,为视力受损患者提供关于驾驶适宜性的合理建议。政策制定者也依靠科学文献来制定基于证据的指导方针,从而对视力受损者公平。因此,临床医生和政策制定者都必须了解如何解读各种研究设计和测量方法,以便他们得出的结论和建议不会过于宽泛、过于狭窄或甚至产生误导。我们提供了一个方法框架,以指导对视力与驾驶研究的解读,该框架也可作为该领域研究人员的启发式工具。在此,我们讨论与驾驶员安全、驾驶表现以及以驾驶员为中心(自我报告)的结果相关的视力研究的研究设计和一般测量方法。

相似文献

1
A roadmap for interpreting the literature on vision and driving.解读视觉与驾驶相关文献的路线图。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2015 May-Jun;60(3):250-62. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
2
Vision and driving.视力与驾驶。
Vision Res. 2010 Nov 23;50(23):2348-61. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.021. Epub 2010 May 23.
4
Motorist vision policy.驾驶者视觉政策。
Optometry. 2000 Jul;71(7):449-53.
5
The impact of dry eye disease on visual performance while driving.干眼症对驾驶时视觉表现的影响。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;156(1):184-189.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.02.019. Epub 2013 May 22.
6
Elderly drivers and simulated visual impairment.老年驾驶员与模拟视觉障碍。
Optom Vis Sci. 1995 Feb;72(2):115-24. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199502000-00010.
7
Vision impairment and driving.视力障碍与驾驶
Surv Ophthalmol. 1999 May-Jun;43(6):535-50. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(99)00035-1.
10
Driving with Glaucoma: Task Performance and Gaze Movements.青光眼患者驾车:任务表现与注视运动
Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Nov;92(11):1037-46. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000702.

引用本文的文献

4
Vision Screening for Motor Vehicle Collision Involvement among Older Drivers.老年驾驶员机动车碰撞事故的视力筛查
Ophthalmology. 2022 Sep;129(9):1022-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.04.013. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
5
Influence of Vision on Drivers: A Pilot Study.视觉对驾驶员的影响:一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 18;18(22):12116. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212116.

本文引用的文献

6
Attention allocation patterns in naturalistic driving.自然驾驶中的注意力分配模式。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Sep;58:140-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.033. Epub 2013 May 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验