Suppr超能文献

十二项世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版(WHO-DAS II):一种非参数项目反应分析。

The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II): a nonparametric item response analysis.

机构信息

Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 May 20;10:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-45.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have analyzed the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II) using classical omnibus measures of scale quality. These analyses are sample dependent and do not model item responses as a function of the underlying trait level. The main objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the WHO-DAS II items and their options in discriminating between changes in the underlying disability level by means of item response analyses. We also explored differential item functioning (DIF) in men and women.

METHODS

The participants were 3615 adult general practice patients from 17 regions of Spain, with a first diagnosed major depressive episode. The 12-item WHO-DAS II was administered by the general practitioners during the consultation. We used a non-parametric item response method (Kernel-Smoothing) implemented with the TestGraf software to examine the effectiveness of each item (item characteristic curves) and their options (option characteristic curves) in discriminating between changes in the underliying disability level. We examined composite DIF to know whether women had a higher probability than men of endorsing each item.

RESULTS

Item response analyses indicated that the twelve items forming the WHO-DAS II perform very well. All items were determined to provide good discrimination across varying standardized levels of the trait. The items also had option characteristic curves that showed good discrimination, given that each increasing option became more likely than the previous as a function of increasing trait level. No gender-related DIF was found on any of the items.

CONCLUSIONS

All WHO-DAS II items were very good at assessing overall disability. Our results supported the appropriateness of the weights assigned to response option categories and showed an absence of gender differences in item functioning.

摘要

背景

先前的研究使用经典的量表质量整体度量标准分析了世界卫生组织残疾评估量表 II(WHO-DAS II)的心理测量特性。这些分析依赖于样本,并未将项目反应建模为潜在特质水平的函数。本研究的主要目的是通过项目反应分析,检查 WHO-DAS II 项目及其选项在区分潜在残疾水平变化方面的有效性。我们还探讨了男性和女性之间的差异项目功能障碍(DIF)。

方法

参与者为来自西班牙 17 个地区的 3615 名成年普通科患者,他们首次被诊断为重度抑郁症发作。12 项 WHO-DAS II 由普通科医生在咨询期间进行管理。我们使用 TestGraf 软件中的非参数项目反应方法(核平滑)来检查每个项目(项目特征曲线)及其选项(选项特征曲线)在区分潜在残疾水平变化方面的有效性。我们检查了综合 DIF,以了解女性比男性更有可能赞同每个项目的情况。

结果

项目反应分析表明,构成 WHO-DAS II 的 12 个项目表现非常出色。所有项目都被确定为在不同标准化特质水平上提供良好的区分度。这些项目还有选项特征曲线,表明具有良好的区分度,因为每个增加的选项都比前一个更有可能随着特质水平的增加而增加。在任何项目上都没有发现与性别相关的 DIF。

结论

所有 WHO-DAS II 项目都非常擅长评估总体残疾情况。我们的结果支持对反应选项类别分配的权重的适当性,并表明在项目功能方面没有性别差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25cb/2881065/63994cf1fdda/1471-2288-10-45-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验