• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会保障残疾申请人的人口统计学和功能差异。

Demographic and functional differences among social security disability claimants.

机构信息

Department of Health Law, Policy, & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

RTI International, Quality Measurement and Health Policy Program, 307 Waverly Oaks Road, Suite 101, Waltham, MA, 02452-8413, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2021 Jun;30(6):1757-1768. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02765-w. Epub 2021 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-021-02765-w
PMID:33611754
Abstract

PURPOSE

Sociodemographic characteristics may influence responses on self-reported measures. Differential item functioning (DIF) is when individuals expected to have the same ability level on a construct of interest have a different probability of endorsing an item on an item response theory (IRT) scale due to population characteristics. The goal of this study was to identify DIF for items in an outcome instrument by sociodemographic factors and, one controlling for DIF, assess true differences in function by those same factors.

METHODS

The Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery 2.0 (WD-FAB 2.0) is an IRT-based self-reported measure of activity limitations relevant to work. Two samples from WD-FAB developed were used: 3793 SSA disability claimants randomly drawn from a pool of 16,500 claimants and a general sample if 2100 working age adults. We used a two-step IRT-based DIF method for three pairs of respondent characteristics: age, gender, and race/ethnicity, and calculated the weighted absolute difference between item characteristic curves. Independent two-group T-tests assessed differences in scores across groups.

RESULTS

Seventeen items displayed DIF. Men had higher scores than women on two physical and two mental function scales. Older respondents had lower physical and higher mental function scores. The lower education group had lower mental function scores.

CONCLUSION

DIF impacts function measurement and is important when assessing psychometric characteristics of instruments. Self-report measures should include diverse samples to conduct similar analyses. WD-FAB 2.0 scores are now reflections of function with reduced bias related to gender, race/ethnicity, or age.

摘要

目的

社会人口统计学特征可能会影响自我报告测量的结果。当预期在感兴趣的结构上具有相同能力水平的个体由于人口特征而对项目反应理论(IRT)量表上的项目具有不同的肯定概率时,就会出现差异项目功能(DIF)。本研究的目的是通过社会人口统计学因素确定结果工具中项目的 DIF,并在这些相同因素的基础上评估功能的真实差异。

方法

工作残疾功能评估电池 2.0(WD-FAB 2.0)是一种基于 IRT 的自我报告衡量与工作相关的活动受限的工具。使用 WD-FAB 开发的两个样本:从 16500 名索赔人中随机抽取的 3793 名 SSA 残疾索赔人和一组 2100 名处于工作年龄的成年人。我们使用基于两步 IRT 的 DIF 方法对三组受访者特征:年龄、性别和种族/民族进行了分析,并计算了项目特征曲线之间的加权绝对差异。独立的两组 T 检验评估了组间分数的差异。

结果

有 17 个项目显示出 DIF。男性在两个身体和两个心理功能量表上的得分高于女性。年龄较大的受访者的身体功能得分较低,心理功能得分较高。受教育程度较低的群体的心理功能得分较低。

结论

DIF 会影响功能测量,在评估工具的心理测量特征时非常重要。自我报告的衡量标准应包括不同的样本,以进行类似的分析。WD-FAB 2.0 的分数现在反映了功能,减少了与性别、种族/民族或年龄相关的偏差。

相似文献

1
Demographic and functional differences among social security disability claimants.社会保障残疾申请人的人口统计学和功能差异。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Jun;30(6):1757-1768. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02765-w. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
2
Scale refinement and initial evaluation of a behavioral health function measurement tool for work disability evaluation.工作残疾评估中行为健康功能测量工具的细化和初步评估。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1679-86. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
3
Development of a computer-adaptive physical function instrument for Social Security Administration disability determination.开发一个适用于社会保障署残疾评定的计算机自适应身体功能仪器。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1661-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.021. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
4
Improving Assessment of Work Related Mental Health Function Using the Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB).使用工作残疾功能评估量表(WD-FAB)改善与工作相关的心理健康功能评估。
J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Mar;28(1):190-199. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9710-5.
5
Development of a self-report physical function instrument for disability assessment: item pool construction and factor analysis.开发一种用于残疾评估的自我报告身体功能工具:项目池构建和因子分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1653-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.011. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
6
Improving measures of work-related physical functioning.改善与工作相关的身体功能测量方法。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Mar;26(3):789-798. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1477-1. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
7
Development of an instrument to measure behavioral health function for work disability: item pool construction and factor analysis.开发用于衡量工作残疾行为健康功能的工具:项目池构建和因子分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1670-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
8
Evaluating measurement equivalence using the item response theory log-likelihood ratio (IRTLR) method to assess differential item functioning (DIF): applications (with illustrations) to measures of physical functioning ability and general distress.使用项目反应理论对数似然比(IRTLR)方法评估测量等价性,以评估项目功能差异(DIF):身体功能能力和一般痛苦测量的应用(附说明)
Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:43-68. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9186-4. Epub 2007 May 5.
9
Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Applied Cognition - General Concerns, Short Forms in Ethnically Diverse Groups.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)应用认知量表在不同种族群体中的测量等效性——一般问题及简表
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(2):255-307.
10
Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning: application to cognitive assessment measures.用于检测项目功能差异的现代心理测量方法:在认知评估测量中的应用。
Stat Med. 2000;19(11-12):1651-83. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000615/30)19:11/12<1651::aid-sim453>3.0.co;2-h.

本文引用的文献

1
Simplifying the Assessment of Measurement Invariance over Multiple Background Variables: Using Regularized Moderated Nonlinear Factor Analysis to Detect Differential Item Functioning.简化对多个背景变量测量不变性的评估:使用正则化调节非线性因子分析检测项目功能差异
Struct Equ Modeling. 2020;27(1):43-55. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2019.1642754. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
2
Simplifying the implementation of modern scale scoring methods with an automated R package: Automated moderated nonlinear factor analysis (aMNLFA).使用自动化 R 包简化现代量表评分方法的实施:自动化适度非线性因子分析 (aMNLFA)。
Addict Behav. 2019 Jul;94:65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.10.031. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
3
Latent variable mixture models to test for differential item functioning: a population-based analysis.
用于检验项目功能差异的潜在变量混合模型:基于人群的分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 15;15(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0674-0.
4
A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning.更一般的测量不变性和项目区分功能检验模型。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):507-526. doi: 10.1037/met0000077. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
5
Work disability functional assessment battery: feasibility and psychometric properties.工作残疾功能评估组合:可行性与心理测量特性
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jun;96(6):1028-35. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.025. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
6
Employment status and mental health among persons with and without a disability: evidence from an Australian cohort study.残疾人和非残疾人的就业状况与心理健康:来自一项澳大利亚队列研究的证据。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Nov;68(11):1064-71. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204147. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
7
Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among US adults: estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 2010.美国成年人多种慢性病的患病率:2010 年全国健康访谈调查的估计。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Apr 25;10:E65. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120203.
8
Development of a computer-adaptive physical function instrument for Social Security Administration disability determination.开发一个适用于社会保障署残疾评定的计算机自适应身体功能仪器。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1661-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.021. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
9
Development of an instrument to measure behavioral health function for work disability: item pool construction and factor analysis.开发用于衡量工作残疾行为健康功能的工具:项目池构建和因子分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1670-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
10
Trends in US older adult disability: exploring age, period, and cohort effects.美国老年残疾趋势:探索年龄、时期和队列效应。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Nov;102(11):2157-63. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300602. Epub 2012 Sep 20.