Galindo-Garre Francisca, Hidalgo María Dolores, Guilera Georgina, Pino Oscar, Rojo J Emilio, Gómez-Benito Juana
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2015 Mar;24(1):1-10. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1462. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II) is a multidimensional instrument developed for measuring disability. It comprises six domains (getting around, self-care, getting along with others, life activities and participation in society). The main purpose of this paper is the evaluation of the psychometric properties for each domain of the WHO-DAS II with parametric and non-parametric Item Response Theory (IRT) models. A secondary objective is to assess whether the WHO-DAS II items within each domain form a hierarchy of invariantly ordered severity indicators of disability. A sample of 352 patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder is used in this study. The 36 items WHO-DAS II was administered during the consultation. Partial Credit and Mokken scale models are used to study the psychometric properties of the questionnaire. The psychometric properties of the WHO-DAS II scale are satisfactory for all the domains. However, we identify a few items that do not discriminate satisfactorily between different levels of disability and cannot be invariantly ordered in the scale. In conclusion the WHO-DAS II can be used to assess overall disability in patients with schizophrenia, but some domains are too general to assess functionality in these patients because they contain items that are not applicable to this pathology.
世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版(WHO-DAS II)是一种用于测量残疾的多维度工具。它包含六个领域(行动能力、自我照顾、与他人相处、生活活动以及社会参与)。本文的主要目的是使用参数化和非参数化项目反应理论(IRT)模型评估WHO-DAS II各领域的心理测量特性。次要目标是评估每个领域内的WHO-DAS II项目是否构成残疾严重程度指标的不变有序层次结构。本研究使用了352名精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的样本。在会诊期间对36项的WHO-DAS II进行了施测。使用部分计分模型和莫肯量表模型来研究问卷的心理测量特性。WHO-DAS II量表的心理测量特性在所有领域都令人满意。然而,我们识别出一些项目在不同残疾水平之间的区分效果不佳,并且在量表中无法进行不变排序。总之,WHO-DAS II可用于评估精神分裂症患者的整体残疾情况,但一些领域过于宽泛,无法评估这些患者的功能,因为它们包含不适用于这种病症的项目。