Dougados M
Paris-Descartes University, Medicine Faculty, UPRES EA-4058; APHP, Cochin Hospital, Rheumatology B Department, Paris, Frankreich.
Z Rheumatol. 2010 Jun;69(4):305-9. doi: 10.1007/s00393-010-0649-6.
Because of the complexity in interpretating the results obtained in original studies and the huge amount of new information available each month, a single rheumatologist is not able to adequately perform an optimal systematic literature research in order to apply this new information in his/her daily practice. These are the main reasons which prompted EULAR (European League against Rheumatism) to publish recommendations mainly for the management of the main musculoskeletal conditions seen in daily practice. These recommendations are written according to a strict methodology combining evidence-based medicine and expert opinions. These recommendations, prepared at the international level, should permit a uniformization of the management of rheumatic patients across the different European countries. All the EULAR initiatives have been generated by joint efforts of epidemiologists, young scientific fellows, and practicing rheumatologists (e.g., experts). Such a process has improved the knowledge of both the fellows and the experts in the field of clinical epidemiology.
由于解读原始研究结果存在复杂性,且每月都有大量新信息涌现,单个风湿病学家无法充分开展最佳的系统性文献研究,以便在日常实践中应用这些新信息。这些就是促使欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)发布主要针对日常实践中常见主要肌肉骨骼疾病管理建议的主要原因。这些建议是根据将循证医学与专家意见相结合的严格方法编写而成。这些在国际层面制定的建议应能使不同欧洲国家的风湿病患者管理实现统一。EULAR的所有举措都是由流行病学家、年轻科研人员和执业风湿病学家(如专家)共同努力产生的。这样一个过程提高了该领域研究人员和专家在临床流行病学方面的知识水平。