Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Psychiatry Res. 2010 Oct 30;179(3):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.09.010. Epub 2010 May 20.
Whereas some research suggests that acknowledgment of the role of biogenetic factors in mental illness could reduce mental illness stigma by diminishing perceived responsibility, other research has cautioned that emphasizing biogenetic aspects of mental illness could produce the impression that mental illness is a stable, intrinsic aspect of a person ("genetic essentialism"), increasing the desire for social distance. We assessed genetic and neurobiological causal attributions about mental illness among 85 people with serious mental illness and 50 members of the public. The perceived responsibility of persons with mental illness for their condition, as well as fear and social distance, was assessed by self-report. Automatic associations between Mental Illness and Guilt and between Self and Guilt were measured by the Brief Implicit Association Test. Among the general public, endorsement of biogenetic models was associated with not only less perceived responsibility, but also greater social distance. Among people with mental illness, endorsement of genetic models had only negative correlates: greater explicit fear and stronger implicit self-guilt associations. Genetic models may have unexpected negative consequences for implicit self-concept and explicit attitudes of people with serious mental illness. An exclusive focus on genetic models may therefore be problematic for clinical practice and anti-stigma initiatives.
虽然一些研究表明,承认生物遗传因素在精神疾病中的作用可以通过减少感知到的责任来减少精神疾病污名,但其他研究警告说,强调精神疾病的生物遗传方面可能会给人留下精神疾病是一个人稳定的、内在的特征的印象(“遗传本质主义”),增加对社会距离的渴望。我们评估了 85 名严重精神疾病患者和 50 名公众对精神疾病的遗传和神经生物学因果归因。通过自我报告评估精神疾病患者对其病情的感知责任、恐惧和社会距离。通过简短的内隐联想测验测量精神疾病与内疚之间以及自我与内疚之间的自动联想。在普通公众中,对生物遗传模型的认可不仅与感知责任降低有关,而且与社会距离增加有关。在精神疾病患者中,遗传模型的认可只有负面的关联:更强的显性恐惧和更强的内隐自我内疚关联。遗传模型可能会对严重精神疾病患者的内隐自我概念和外显态度产生意想不到的负面影响。因此,过分关注遗传模型可能对临床实践和反污名倡议构成问题。