Glazier Jessica J, Gomez Eric M, Olson Kristina R
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Collabra Psychol. 2021;7(1). doi: 10.1525/collabra.25528. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
Previous research often suggests that people who endorse more essentialist beliefs about social groups are also likely to show increased prejudice towards members of these social groups, and there is even some evidence to suggest that essentialism may lead to prejudice and stereotyping. However, there are several notable exceptions to this pattern in that, for certain social groups (e.g., gay men and lesbians), higher essentialism is actually related to lower prejudice. The current studies further explored the relationship between essentialism and prejudice by examining a novel type of essentialism-transgender essentialism (i.e., essentializing transgender identity), and its relationship to prejudice towards transgender people. Study 1 ( = 248) tested the viability of transgender essentialism as a construct and examined the association between transgender essentialism and transprejudice, while Studies 2a ( = 315), 2b ( = 343), 3a ( = 310), and 3b ( = 204) tested two casual pathways to explain this relationship. The results consistently showed that the more that people endorse transgender essentialist beliefs, the warmer their feelings towards trans people (relative to cis people) were, echoing past research showing a similar relationship between essentialism and prejudice towards sexual minorities. However, the manipulations of both essentialism (Studies 2a and 2b) and prejudice (Studies 3a and 3b) were largely unsuccessful at changing the desired construct, meaning we were unable to provide direct causal tests. The one exception was a successful manipulation of the universality of trans experiences, but even here this resulted in no change in prejudice. The primary contribution of this work is in robustly demonstrating that greater transgender essentialism is associated with transprejudice.
以往的研究常常表明,那些对社会群体持有更多本质主义信念的人,也更有可能对这些社会群体的成员表现出更多的偏见,甚至有一些证据表明本质主义可能导致偏见和刻板印象。然而,这种模式存在几个显著的例外情况,即对于某些社会群体(例如男同性恋者和女同性恋者),更高程度的本质主义实际上与更低的偏见相关。当前的研究通过考察一种新型的本质主义——跨性别本质主义(即将跨性别身份本质化)及其与对跨性别者的偏见之间的关系,进一步探究了本质主义与偏见之间的关系。研究1(N = 248)测试了跨性别本质主义作为一种概念结构的可行性,并考察了跨性别本质主义与跨性别偏见之间的关联,而研究2a(N = 315)、2b(N = 343)、3a(N = 310)和3b(N = 204)测试了两条解释这种关系的因果路径。结果一致表明,人们越认同跨性别本质主义信念,他们对跨性别者(相对于顺性别者)的态度就越积极,这与过去关于本质主义与对性少数群体的偏见之间类似关系的研究结果相呼应。然而,本质主义(研究2a和2b)和偏见(研究3a和3b)的操纵在很大程度上未能改变预期的概念结构,这意味着我们无法进行直接的因果检验。唯一的例外是对跨性别经历普遍性的成功操纵,但即便如此,这也并未导致偏见的改变。这项研究的主要贡献在于有力地证明了更强的跨性别本质主义与跨性别偏见相关。