Day Matthew
Department of Religion, Florida State University, 641 University Way, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1520, USA.
Perspect Biol Med. 2010 Spring;53(2):289-303. doi: 10.1353/pbm.0.0153.
Since The Meaning of Evolution (1992), Robert J. Richards has argued that modern evolutionary theory is rooted in late 18th-century Romantic science. The publication of The Tragic Sense of Life (2009) provides a fitting occasion to evaluate how this perspective revises the standard history of biological thought. This essay focuses on three aspects of Richards's attempt to rehabilitate the reputation of German Naturphilosophie: (1) the identification of Romantic strains in Charles Darwin's portrait of evolutionary history; (2) the demonstration that any attempt to treat Ernst Haeckel as a "pseudo-Darwinian" inevitably renders Darwin himself a "pseudo-Darwinian"; and (3) the denial of Haeckel's alleged responsibility for the rise of Nazi racial hygiene. This article examines Richards's case for clearing Haeckel's name, as well as the subsequent (slanderous) charge from Daniel Gasman that Richards is guilty of whitewashing the Haeckelian roots of the Holocaust.
自《进化的意义》(1992年)出版以来,罗伯特·J·理查兹一直认为现代进化理论植根于18世纪晚期的浪漫主义科学。《生命的悲剧意识》(2009年)的出版为评估这一观点如何修正生物学思想的标准历史提供了一个恰当的契机。本文聚焦于理查兹为恢复德国自然哲学声誉所做努力的三个方面:(1)在查尔斯·达尔文对进化史的描绘中识别浪漫主义元素;(2)证明任何将恩斯特·海克尔视为“伪达尔文主义者”的企图都不可避免地会使达尔文本人也成为“伪达尔文主义者”;(3)否认海克尔被指控对纳粹种族卫生学兴起负有责任。本文审视了理查兹为海克尔洗刷罪名的理由,以及丹尼尔·加斯曼随后(恶意)指控理查兹为大屠杀的海克尔根源进行粉饰。