Suppr超能文献

通过在计算机辅助教学中教授行为改变策略,提高了营养学专业学生选择适当沟通和咨询方法的能力。

Dietetics students' ability to choose appropriate communication and counseling methods is improved by teaching behavior-change strategies in computer-assisted instruction.

作者信息

Puri Ruchi, Bell Carol, Evers William D

机构信息

Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), Indiana Health Centers, Inc, Frankfort, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Jun;110(6):892-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.03.022.

Abstract

Several models and theories have been proposed to help registered dietitians (RD) counsel and communicate nutrition information to patients. However, there is little time for students or interns to observe and/or participate in counseling sessions. Computer-assisted instruction (CAI) can be used to give students more opportunity to observe the various methods and theories of counseling. This study used CAI simulations of RD-client communications to examine whether students who worked through the CAI modules would choose more appropriate counseling methods. Modules were created based on information from experienced RD. They contained videos of RD-patient interactions and demonstrated helpful and less helpful methods of communication. Students in didactic programs in dietetics accessed the modules via the Internet. The intervention group of students received a pretest module, two tutorial modules, and a posttest module. The control group only received the pretest and posttest modules. Data were collected during three semesters in 2006 and 2007. Two sample t tests were used to compare pretest and posttest scores. The influence of other factors was measured using factorial analysis of variance. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Eleven didactic programs participated. A total of 350 students were in the intervention group and 102 students were in the control group. Pretest scores were not different (6.30+/-0.26 vs 6.21+/-0.15, control and intervention, respectively). The intervention group's posttest score was higher than its pretest score (6.21+/-0.15 vs 6.65+/-0.16, pretest and posttest, respectively). Change in score from pretest to posttest was higher for the intervention group (-0.02+/-0.20 vs 0.44+/-0.11, control and intervention, respectively). For the 21 questions in the tutorials, those who answered 19 to 21 correctly had a greater increase from pretest to posttest than those who answered <13 correctly (-0.44+/-0.37 vs 0.84+/-0.17, <13 and 19 to 21 correct, respectively). There was no effect of instructor, grade point average, school year, or prior counseling on the results. The study provides evidence that the use of CAI can improve communication and counseling methods for dietetics students.

摘要

已经提出了几种模型和理论来帮助注册营养师(RD)为患者提供咨询并传达营养信息。然而,学生或实习生几乎没有时间去观察和/或参与咨询环节。计算机辅助教学(CAI)可用于让学生有更多机会观察各种咨询方法和理论。本研究使用RD与客户沟通的CAI模拟来检验完成CAI模块的学生是否会选择更合适的咨询方法。模块是根据经验丰富的注册营养师提供的信息创建的。它们包含RD与患者互动的视频,并展示了有用和不太有用的沟通方法。营养学教学项目中的学生通过互联网访问这些模块。干预组的学生接受一个预测试模块、两个辅导模块和一个后测试模块。对照组只接受预测试和后测试模块。数据在2006年和2007年的三个学期收集。使用双样本t检验比较预测试和后测试分数。使用方差分析来测量其他因素的影响。设定统计学显著性为P<0.05。有11个教学项目参与。干预组共有350名学生,对照组有102名学生。预测试分数没有差异(对照组和干预组分别为6.30±0.26和6.21±0.15)。干预组的后测试分数高于其预测试分数(预测试和后测试分别为6.21±0.15和6.65±0.16)。干预组从预测试到后测试的分数变化更大(对照组和干预组分别为-0.02±0.20和0.44±0.11)。对于辅导中的21个问题,回答19至21个正确的学生从预测试到后测试的分数增加比回答少于13个正确的学生更大(回答少于13个正确和回答19至21个正确的学生分别为-0.44±0.37和0.84±0.17)。教师、平均绩点、学年或先前的咨询对结果没有影响。该研究提供了证据表明使用CAI可以改善营养学学生的沟通和咨询方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验