Center for Urban Epidemiologic Studies, New York Academy of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Epidemiology. 2010 Jul;21(4):482-9. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e13539.
Previous studies on the relationship of neighborhood disadvantage with alcohol use or misuse have often controlled for individual characteristics on the causal pathway, such as income-thus potentially underestimating the relationship between disadvantage and alcohol consumption.
We used data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study of 5115 adults aged 18-30 years at baseline and interviewed 7 times between 1985 and 2006. We estimated marginal structural models using inverse probability-of-treatment and censoring weights to assess the association between point-in-time/cumulative exposure to neighborhood poverty (proportion of census tract residents living in poverty) and alcohol use/binging, after accounting for time-dependent confounders including income, education, and occupation.
The log-normal model was used to estimate treatment weights while accounting for highly-skewed continuous neighborhood poverty data. In the weighted model, a one-unit increase in neighborhood poverty at the prior examination was associated with a 86% increase in the odds of binging (OR = 1.86 [95% confidence interval = 1.14-3.03]); the estimate from a standard generalized-estimating-equations model controlling for baseline and time-varying covariates was 1.47 (0.96-2.25). The inverse probability-of-treatment and censoring weighted estimate of the relative increase in the number of weekly drinks in the past year associated with cumulative neighborhood poverty was 1.53 (1.02-2.27); the estimate from a standard model was 1.16 (0.83-1.62).
Cumulative and point-in-time measures of neighborhood poverty are important predictors of alcohol consumption. Estimators that more closely approximate a causal effect of neighborhood poverty on alcohol provided a stronger estimate than estimators from traditional regression models.
先前关于邻里劣势与饮酒或滥用酒精之间关系的研究通常在因果途径上控制了个体特征,如收入,从而可能低估了劣势与饮酒之间的关系。
我们使用了来自于冠状动脉风险发展在年轻人研究的数据,该研究纳入了 5115 名年龄在 18-30 岁的成年人,基线时有随访 7 次,时间跨度为 1985 年至 2006 年。我们使用逆概率治疗和删失权重估计边缘结构模型,以评估在考虑到时间依赖性混杂因素(包括收入、教育和职业)后,时点/累积暴露于邻里贫困(居住在贫困地区的人口比例)与饮酒/狂饮之间的关联。
对数正态模型用于估计治疗权重,同时考虑到高度偏态的连续邻里贫困数据。在加权模型中,前一次检查中邻里贫困增加一个单位与狂饮的几率增加 86%相关(比值比=1.86[95%置信区间=1.14-3.03]);从控制基线和时变协变量的标准广义估计方程模型得出的估计值为 1.47(0.96-2.25)。与累积邻里贫困相关的过去一年每周饮酒量的相对增加的逆概率治疗和删失权重估计值为 1.53(1.02-2.27);从标准模型得出的估计值为 1.16(0.83-1.62)。
邻里贫困的累积和时点测量是饮酒的重要预测因素。更接近邻里贫困对酒精的因果效应的估计值比传统回归模型的估计值更强。