Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.
J Urban Health. 2013 Aug;90(4):667-84. doi: 10.1007/s11524-013-9786-y.
Alcohol use can cause significant harm. We examined the relationships between neighborhood disadvantage, consumption of high-alcohol-content beverages (HACB), drinking norms, and self-reported drinking consequences using data from the 2000 and 2005 National Alcohol Surveys (N = 9,971 current drinkers) and the 2000 Decennial Census. We hypothesized that (1) individuals living in disadvantaged neighborhoods would report more negative drinking consequences than individuals living in more affluent neighborhoods, and (2) this relationship would be mediated by HACB consumption and pro-drunkenness drinking norms. Neighborhood disadvantage was based on a composite measure of socioeconomic indicators from the 2000 Decennial Census (five-item composite, alpha = 0.89). We measured high alcohol content beverage consumption in terms of whether respondents engaged in frequent or heavy consumption of malt liquor, fortified wine, or distilled spirits/liquor. The outcome was a dichotomous indicator of two or more of 15 past-year social, legal, work, and health consequences. Simultaneous, multivariate path modeling tested direct and indirect effects of neighborhood disadvantage, HACB consumption, and pro-drunkenness norms on consequences. Individuals living in disadvantaged neighborhoods reported significantly more negative drinking consequences than individuals living in more affluent neighborhoods. Consumption of high-alcohol-content beverages and pro-drunkenness norms did not mediate this relationship. However, heavy distilled spirits/liquor use was a significant mediator of other neighborhood characteristics (i.e., percent African American). Living in an African American neighborhood was related to increased spirits/liquor consumption and, in turn, reporting more negative drinking consequences. Greater scrutiny of advertising and tax policies related to distilled spirits/liquor is needed to prevent future drinking problems, especially in minority neighborhoods.
饮酒会造成严重危害。我们利用 2000 年和 2005 年全国酒精调查(N=9971 名当前饮酒者)和 2000 年十年普查的数据,检验了邻里贫困、高酒精饮料(HACB)消费、饮酒规范与自我报告的饮酒后果之间的关系。我们假设:(1)居住在贫困社区的个体比居住在较富裕社区的个体报告更多的负面饮酒后果;(2)这种关系将通过 HACB 消费和醉酒促进规范来中介。邻里贫困是基于 2000 年十年普查的社会经济指标综合衡量(五项综合指标,alpha=0.89)。我们用受访者是否经常或大量饮用麦芽酒、强化葡萄酒或蒸馏酒/烈酒来衡量高酒精饮料的消费。结果是过去一年 15 项社会、法律、工作和健康后果中的两项或更多项的二分类指标。同时,多元路径模型检验了邻里贫困、HACB 消费和醉酒促进规范对后果的直接和间接影响。居住在贫困社区的个体比居住在较富裕社区的个体报告更多的负面饮酒后果。HACB 消费和醉酒促进规范并不能调解这种关系。然而,大量饮用蒸馏酒/烈酒是其他邻里特征(即非裔美国人比例)的一个重要中介。居住在非裔美国人社区与烈酒/烈酒消费增加有关,进而与更多负面饮酒后果有关。需要更严格地审查与蒸馏酒/烈酒相关的广告和税收政策,以防止未来的饮酒问题,尤其是在少数民族社区。