Suppr超能文献

异丙酚效应部位平衡速率常数的血浆浓度滴定;“浓度-概率-时间”的连接方法。

Titration of the plasma effect site equilibrium rate constant of propofol; a link method of 'Concentration-Probability-Time'.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ajou University, Suwon, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010 Mar;58(3):231-8. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2010.58.3.231. Epub 2010 Mar 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The plasma effect-site equilibrium rate constant (k(e0)) of propofol has been reported in various pharmacodynamic studies; however, it is not desirable to apply k(e0) for the link with pharmacokinetic models that were separately investigated. Thus, we titrated k(e0) for the pharmacokinetic model, which is known as the multiple covariates adjusted model of propofol.

METHODS

Ninety female patients scheduled for gynecologic surgery were randomly assigned to three groups targeting different plasma concentrations of 5.4, 8.1, and 10.8 microg/ml. Target-controlled infusions (TCI) were provided by a computer-assisted continuous infusion system. Time to loss of responsiveness (LOR) was measured by a blind investigator; effect-site concentrations (C(e)) for LOR were then calculated with simulation of TCI using different k(e0)s. We determined the k(e0) minimizing total discrepancy (TD) between the inputted and calculated k(e0) from the t(1/2)k(e0)s for a given probability of LOR of the C(e), and also obtained the k(e0) for the minimal TD between the median C(e), which were compared to the known k(e0).

RESULTS

K(e0)s from these two methods were 0.3692 and 0.3788/min. C(e)s for LOR with these k(e0)s were significantly different from those with Schnider's k(e0).

CONCLUSIONS

We proposed a method for titration of the k(e0) of propofol. The k(e0)s of propofol was lower than Schnider's k(e0). An adequate k(e0) for the specific pharmacokinetic model and a certain population would be useful for prediction of an accurate C(e), and could be used for calculation of accurate dosing during targeting of the effect site.

摘要

背景

丙泊酚的血浆效应部位平衡速率常数(k(e0))已在各种药效学研究中报道;然而,将 k(e0) 应用于分别研究的药代动力学模型并不理想。因此,我们对 k(e0) 进行了滴定,以建立丙泊酚的药代动力学模型,即被称为丙泊酚的多协变量调整模型。

方法

90 名择期行妇科手术的女性患者被随机分配到三个血浆浓度目标分别为 5.4、8.1 和 10.8μg/ml 的组。采用计算机辅助连续输注系统进行靶控输注(TCI)。由盲法研究者测量意识消失时间(LOR);然后使用不同 k(e0) 的 TCI 模拟计算 LOR 的效应部位浓度(C(e))。我们确定了使输入和计算的 k(e0)之间的总差异(TD)最小的 k(e0),该 k(e0)是给定 C(e)LOR 概率的 t(1/2)k(e0),并且还获得了最小 TD 之间的 k(e0)中位数 C(e),并将其与已知的 k(e0)进行了比较。

结果

这两种方法的 k(e0)分别为 0.3692 和 0.3788/min。使用这些 k(e0)的 LOR 的 C(e)与 Schnider 的 k(e0)的 C(e)显著不同。

结论

我们提出了一种滴定丙泊酚 k(e0)的方法。丙泊酚的 k(e0)低于 Schnider 的 k(e0)。特定药代动力学模型和特定人群的适当 k(e0)将有助于准确预测 C(e),并可用于在靶向效应部位时计算准确的给药剂量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e482/2872834/2ff967cdbb9f/kjae-58-231-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验