• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究丙泊酚临床效应时间过程与预测效应部位浓度时间过程的比较:三种药代动力学-药效动力学模型的表现。

Study of the time course of the clinical effect of propofol compared with the time course of the predicted effect-site concentration: Performance of three pharmacokinetic-dynamic models.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2010 Apr;104(4):452-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq028. Epub 2010 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aeq028
PMID:20190259
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the ideal pharmacokinetic-dynamic (PK-PD) model for calculating the predicted effect-site concentration of propofol (Ce(PROP)), for any Ce(PROP), the corresponding hypnotic effect should be constant. We compared three PK-PD models (Marsh PK with Shüttler PD, Schnider PK with fixed ke0, and Schnider PK with Minto PD) in their ability to maintain a constant bispectral index (BIS), while using the respective effect-site-controlled target-controlled infusion (TCI) algorithms.

METHODS

We randomized 60 patients to Group M (Marsh's model with k(e0)=0.26 min(-1)), Group S1 or Group S2 (Schnider's model with a fixed k(e0)=0.456 min(-1) or a k(e0) adapted to a fixed time-to-peak effect=1.6 min, respectively). All patients received propofol at a constant rate until loss of consciousness. The corresponding Ce(PROP), as calculated by the respective models, was set as a target for effect-site-controlled TCI. We observed BIS for 20 min. We hypothesized that BIS remains constant, if Ce(PROP) remains constant over time.

RESULTS

All patients in Group M woke up, one in Group S1 and none in Group S2. In Groups S1 and S2, BIS remained constant after 11 min of constant Ce(PROP), at a more pronounced level of hypnotic drug effect than intended.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting Ce(PROP) at which patients lose consciousness with effect-site-controlled TCI does not translate into an immediate constant effect.

摘要

背景

在计算丙泊酚效应部位浓度(Ce(PROP))的理想药代动力学-药效动力学(PK-PD)模型中,对于任何 Ce(PROP),相应的催眠效果应该是恒定的。我们比较了三种 PK-PD 模型(Marsh PK 与 Shüttler PD、Schnider PK 与固定 ke0 以及 Schnider PK 与 Minto PD)在维持恒定双频谱指数(BIS)方面的能力,同时使用各自的效应部位控制的靶控输注(TCI)算法。

方法

我们将 60 名患者随机分为 M 组(Marsh 模型,k(e0)=0.26 min(-1))、S1 组或 S2 组(Schnider 模型,固定 k(e0)=0.456 min(-1)或 k(e0)适应于固定的达峰时间=1.6 min)。所有患者均以恒定速度输注丙泊酚直至意识丧失。由各模型计算得出的相应 Ce(PROP)被设定为效应部位控制 TCI 的靶目标。我们观察了 20 分钟的 BIS。我们假设如果 Ce(PROP)随时间保持不变,则 BIS 保持不变。

结果

M 组的所有患者均苏醒,S1 组的 1 例患者和 S2 组的无患者苏醒。在 S1 组和 S2 组中,在持续的 Ce(PROP)恒定 11 分钟后,BIS 保持恒定,催眠药物效应的程度比预期的更为明显。

结论

使用效应部位控制 TCI 将患者意识丧失时的 Ce(PROP)设定为靶目标并不能立即产生恒定的效果。

相似文献

1
Study of the time course of the clinical effect of propofol compared with the time course of the predicted effect-site concentration: Performance of three pharmacokinetic-dynamic models.研究丙泊酚临床效应时间过程与预测效应部位浓度时间过程的比较:三种药代动力学-药效动力学模型的表现。
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Apr;104(4):452-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq028. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
2
[Reevaluation of the time course of the effect of propofol described with the Schnider pharmacokinetic model].[用施奈德药代动力学模型对丙泊酚效应时程的重新评估]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Dec;59(10):542-8. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.019. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
3
Performance of propofol target-controlled infusion models in the obese: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis.丙泊酚靶控输注模型在肥胖患者中的性能:药代动力学和药效学分析。
Anesth Analg. 2014 Aug;119(2):302-310. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000317.
4
Effect site concentration during propofol TCI sedation: a comparison of sedation score with two pharmacokinetic models.丙泊酚靶控输注镇静期间效应室浓度:两种药代动力学模型的镇静评分比较
Anaesthesia. 2007 Jul;62(7):661-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05059.x.
5
Comparison of plasma compartment versus two methods for effect compartment--controlled target-controlled infusion for propofol.血浆室与两种效应室方法的比较——丙泊酚的效应室控制靶控输注
Anesthesiology. 2000 Feb;92(2):399-406. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200002000-00021.
6
The performance of compartmental and physiologically based recirculatory pharmacokinetic models for propofol: a comparison using bolus, continuous, and target-controlled infusion data.隔室和基于生理的丙泊酚再循环药代动力学模型的性能:使用推注、连续和靶控输注数据的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Aug;111(2):368-79. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bdcf5b. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
7
Simulation analysis of the performance of target-controlled infusion of propofol in Chinese patients.丙泊酚靶控输注在中国患者中的性能模拟分析。
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2007 Sep;45(3):141-7.
8
Hemodynamic responses during induction: comparison of Marsh and Schnider pharmacokinetic models.诱导期的血流动力学反应:Marsh和Schnider药代动力学模型的比较
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jan;53(1):32-40. doi: 10.5414/CP202141.
9
Influence of administration rate on propofol plasma-effect site equilibration.给药速率对丙泊酚血浆-效应室平衡的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2007 Sep;107(3):386-96. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000278902.15505.f8.
10
Age progression from vicenarians (20-29 year) to nonagenarians (90-99 year) among a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PopPk-PD) covariate analysis of propofol-bispectral index (BIS) electroencephalography.基于人群药代动力学/药效学(PopPk-PD)协变量分析,对丙泊酚-双频谱指数(BIS)脑电监测下 20-29 岁至 90-99 岁人群进行年龄推断。
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2020 Apr;47(2):145-161. doi: 10.1007/s10928-020-09678-0. Epub 2020 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Different behaviour of target-controlled infusion pumps despite apparently using the same Schnider pharmacokinetic model: An observational in vitro study.尽管明显使用相同的施奈德药代动力学模型,但靶控输注泵的行为却有所不同:一项体外观察性研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2022 Nov 28;1(6):e011. doi: 10.1097/EA9.0000000000000011. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
The influence of different application patterns of propofol on the sedation courses during drug-induced sleep endoscopy.丙泊酚不同应用模式对药物诱导睡眠内镜检查期间镇静过程的影响。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 Jun 17;9(3):e1258. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1258. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Development of extended pharmacokinetic models for propofol based on measured blood and brain concentrations.
基于测量的血药浓度和脑浓度建立丙泊酚扩展药代动力学模型。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 15;14(1):6326. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56863-z.
4
Electroencephalographic guided propofol-remifentanil TCI anesthesia with and without dexmedetomidine in a geriatric population: electroencephalographic signatures and clinical evaluation.老年人群中应用右美托咪定的脑电双频指数指导丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼 TCI 麻醉与无右美托咪定的比较:脑电特征与临床评估。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Aug;38(4):803-815. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01127-4. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
5
A Deep Learning Framework for Anesthesia Depth Prediction from Drug Infusion History.基于药物输注历史的麻醉深度预测深度学习框架。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Nov 6;23(21):8994. doi: 10.3390/s23218994.
6
Permutation entropy is not an age-independent parameter for EEG-based anesthesia monitoring.对于基于脑电图的麻醉监测而言,排列熵并非一个与年龄无关的参数。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Jun 15;15:1173304. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1173304. eCollection 2023.
7
External Evaluation of Population Pharmacokinetic Models for Precision Dosing: Current State and Knowledge Gaps.精准给药群体药代动力学模型的外部评估:现状与知识差距
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 Apr;62(4):533-540. doi: 10.1007/s40262-023-01233-7. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
8
General Purpose Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Models for Target-Controlled Infusion of Anaesthetic Drugs: A Narrative Review.用于麻醉药物靶控输注的通用药代动力学-药效学模型:一项叙述性综述。
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 28;11(9):2487. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092487.
9
Comparison of haemodynamic- and electroencephalographic-monitored effects evoked by four combinations of effect-site concentrations of propofol and remifentanil, yielding a predicted tolerance to laryngoscopy of 90.比较靶控输注丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼四种效应室浓度组合诱发的血流动力学和脑电图监测效应,预测对喉镜检查的耐受度为 90。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Aug;35(4):815-825. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00540-9. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
10
Mechanisms of hysteresis in human brain networks during transitions of consciousness and unconsciousness: Theoretical principles and empirical evidence.意识和无意识状态转换过程中人类脑网络滞后的机制:理论原理和实证证据。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Aug 30;14(8):e1006424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006424. eCollection 2018 Aug.