• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

峰双频谱指数时间不能预测效应室控制输注算法的早期丙泊酚药效动力学。

The peak bispectral index time cannot predict early phase propofol pharmacodynamics with effect site-controlled infusion algorithm.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pediatric Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Indian J Pharmacol. 2012 Jan;44(1):41-5. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.91865.

DOI:10.4103/0253-7613.91865
PMID:22345868
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3271538/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The plasma-effect site equilibration rate constant (ke0) of propofol was determined with peak bispectral index (BIS) time (T(PEAK)) in our previous study. The present study has been conducted to evaluate the ke0's performance with effect site-controlled infusion algorithm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty unpremedicated patients were randomized to group TE1 (Schnider's pharmacokinetic model with ke0 adapted to T(PEAK) = 74s) and TE2 (T(PEAK) = 96s). In stage 1, all patients received propofol with effect-site concentration (Ce) controlled infusion. Once the pump had injected the mass of propofol necessary to achieve pre-set Ce and while the infusion was stopped, target was reset at 0 μg/ml. When BIS returned to 80 or above, then, in stage 2, the patients received plasma concentration controlled infusion for 10 min. The time of loss of responsiveness (LOR) and BIS were recorded. The differences of Ce at the time of LOR, lowest BIS between stages 1 and 2, hysteresis loop were used to evaluate the performance of ke0.

RESULTS

In both groups, the calculated propofol Ce at the time of LOR in stages 1 and 2 differed significantly (P<0.01); the mean lowest BIS in stage 1 were significantly higher than those in stage 2 (P < 0.05).The relations of propofol Ce versus BIS revealed the apparent hysteresis loop.

CONCLUSIONS

The study cannot clinically validate the accuracy of application of ke0 derived from the T(PEAK) = 74 s of BIS with Schnider propofol pharmacokinetic model.

摘要

目的

在我们之前的研究中,使用峰双频谱指数(BIS)时间(T(PEAK))确定了丙泊酚的血浆-效应部位平衡速率常数(ke0)。本研究旨在评估 ke0 在效应部位控制输注算法中的性能。

材料和方法

40 例未接受预处理的患者随机分为 TE1 组(Schnider 药代动力学模型,ke0 适应 T(PEAK)= 74s)和 TE2 组(T(PEAK)= 96s)。在第 1 阶段,所有患者均接受丙泊酚效应部位浓度(Ce)控制输注。一旦泵注入达到预设 Ce 所需的丙泊酚质量,且输注停止时,目标重置为 0μg/ml。当 BIS 恢复到 80 或以上时,然后在第 2 阶段,患者接受 10 分钟的血浆浓度控制输注。记录意识消失(LOR)和 BIS 的时间。用于评估 ke0 性能的参数包括 LOR 时的 Ce 差异、第 1 阶段和第 2 阶段之间的最低 BIS 差异和滞后环。

结果

在两组中,第 1 阶段和第 2 阶段 LOR 时的计算丙泊酚 Ce 差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);第 1 阶段的平均最低 BIS 明显高于第 2 阶段(P<0.05)。丙泊酚 Ce 与 BIS 的关系揭示了明显的滞后环。

结论

该研究不能临床验证 Schnider 丙泊酚药代动力学模型中 T(PEAK)= 74s 的 BIS 衍生的 ke0 应用的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/605c/3271538/7e8d2e534c74/IJPharm-44-41-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/605c/3271538/7e8d2e534c74/IJPharm-44-41-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/605c/3271538/7e8d2e534c74/IJPharm-44-41-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The peak bispectral index time cannot predict early phase propofol pharmacodynamics with effect site-controlled infusion algorithm.峰双频谱指数时间不能预测效应室控制输注算法的早期丙泊酚药效动力学。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2012 Jan;44(1):41-5. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.91865.
2
[Reevaluation of the time course of the effect of propofol described with the Schnider pharmacokinetic model].[用施奈德药代动力学模型对丙泊酚效应时程的重新评估]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Dec;59(10):542-8. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.019. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
3
Study of the time course of the clinical effect of propofol compared with the time course of the predicted effect-site concentration: Performance of three pharmacokinetic-dynamic models.研究丙泊酚临床效应时间过程与预测效应部位浓度时间过程的比较:三种药代动力学-药效动力学模型的表现。
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Apr;104(4):452-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq028. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
4
A comparison between bispectral index analysis and auditory-evoked potentials for monitoring the time to peak effect to calculate the plasma effect site equilibration rate constant of propofol.比较双谱指数分析与听觉诱发电位用于监测达到峰值效应的时间以计算丙泊酚的血浆效应室平衡速率常数。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Oct;24(10):876-81. doi: 10.1017/S0265021507000890. Epub 2007 Jun 22.
5
BIS - AAI and clinical measures during propofol target controlled infusion with Schnider's pharmacokinetic model.使用施奈德药代动力学模型进行丙泊酚靶控输注期间的脑电双频指数-听觉诱发电位指数及临床指标
Minerva Anestesiol. 2007 Jan-Feb;73(1-2):23-31.
6
The comparison of predictive performance in bispectral index prediction during target effect-site controlled infusion of propofol using different blood effect-site equilibration rate constants in the same pharmacokinetic model.同一药代动力学模型中不同血药-效应室平衡速率常数用于目标效应室靶控输注丙泊酚时脑电双频指数预测性能的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Oct;65(4):299-305. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.4.299. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
7
Clinical evaluation of two Ke0 in the same pharmacokinetic propofol model: study on loss and recovery of consciousness.同一药代动力学丙泊酚模型中两个Ke0的临床评估:意识丧失与恢复的研究
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2011 Jul-Aug;61(4):397-408. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(11)70048-4.
8
Performance of propofol target-controlled infusion models in the obese: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis.丙泊酚靶控输注模型在肥胖患者中的性能:药代动力学和药效学分析。
Anesth Analg. 2014 Aug;119(2):302-310. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000317.
9
Spectral entropy measurement of patient responsiveness during propofol and remifentanil. A comparison with the bispectral index.丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼麻醉期间患者反应性的熵指数监测:与脑电双频指数的比较
Br J Anaesth. 2004 Nov;93(5):645-54. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh251. Epub 2004 Aug 20.
10
Titration of the plasma effect site equilibrium rate constant of propofol; a link method of 'Concentration-Probability-Time'.异丙酚效应部位平衡速率常数的血浆浓度滴定;“浓度-概率-时间”的连接方法。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010 Mar;58(3):231-8. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2010.58.3.231. Epub 2010 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Consciousness and Anesthesia: An Update for the Clinician.意识与麻醉:给临床医生的最新资讯
Adv Anesth. 2012;30(1):13-27. doi: 10.1016/j.aan.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
2
Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Remifentanil in Infants with Unrepaired Tetralogy of Fallot.未修复法洛四联症婴儿瑞芬太尼的群体药代动力学建模
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2019 Feb;44(1):53-62. doi: 10.1007/s13318-018-0489-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Study of the time course of the clinical effect of propofol compared with the time course of the predicted effect-site concentration: Performance of three pharmacokinetic-dynamic models.研究丙泊酚临床效应时间过程与预测效应部位浓度时间过程的比较:三种药代动力学-药效动力学模型的表现。
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Apr;104(4):452-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq028. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
2
Early phase pharmacokinetics but not pharmacodynamics are influenced by propofol infusion rate.早期药代动力学而非药效学受丙泊酚输注率的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2009 Oct;111(4):805-17. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b799c1.
3
Prospective evaluation of the time to peak effect of propofol to target the effect site in children.
丙泊酚在儿童中达到效应室峰值效应时间的前瞻性评估。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Aug;53(7):883-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.01995.x. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
4
Influence of administration rate on propofol plasma-effect site equilibration.给药速率对丙泊酚血浆-效应室平衡的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2007 Sep;107(3):386-96. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000278902.15505.f8.
5
A comparison between bispectral index analysis and auditory-evoked potentials for monitoring the time to peak effect to calculate the plasma effect site equilibration rate constant of propofol.比较双谱指数分析与听觉诱发电位用于监测达到峰值效应的时间以计算丙泊酚的血浆效应室平衡速率常数。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Oct;24(10):876-81. doi: 10.1017/S0265021507000890. Epub 2007 Jun 22.
6
Time delay of index calculation: analysis of cerebral state, bispectral, and narcotrend indices.指数计算的时间延迟:脑状态指数、双谱指数和麻醉深度指数的分析
Anesthesiology. 2006 Mar;104(3):488-94. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200603000-00016.
7
Estimation of the plasma effect site equilibration rate constant (ke0) of propofol in children using the time to peak effect: comparison with adults.利用达峰时间估算儿童丙泊酚的血浆效应室平衡速率常数(ke0):与成人的比较
Anesthesiology. 2004 Dec;101(6):1269-74. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200412000-00005.
8
Induction speed is not a determinant of propofol pharmacodynamics.诱导速度不是丙泊酚药效学的决定因素。
Anesthesiology. 2004 Nov;101(5):1112-21. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200411000-00010.
9
A new system to target the effect-site during propofol sedation.一种在丙泊酚镇静期间靶向效应部位的新系统。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003 Sep;47(8):944-50. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00161.x.
10
Using the time of maximum effect site concentration to combine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.利用效应室浓度达峰时间结合药代动力学和药效学。
Anesthesiology. 2003 Aug;99(2):324-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00014.