Doufas A G, Bakhshandeh M, Bjorksten A R, Greif R, Sessler D I
OUTCOMES RESEARCH Institute and Department of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003 Sep;47(8):944-50. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00161.x.
We evaluated a new, integrated, covariate-adjusted, target-controlled infusion system during sedation with propofol combined with 50% nitrous oxide (N2O) and with propofol only (Air).
The protocol consisted of sequential 15-minute cycles in 20 volunteers. After a 15-minute control period, propofol was infused to an initial target effect-site concentration of 0.25 microg x ml-1 (N2O) or 1.5 microg x ml-1 (Air). Subsequently, the target effect-site concentration was increased by 0.25 (N2O) or 0.5 microg x ml-1 (Air) for 15 min This sequence was continued until the volunteers lost consciousness as defined by an Observer's Assessment Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) score = 2.
Venous plasma propofol concentrations at the beginning(9 elapsed minutes) and end(15 elapsed minutes) of the pseudo-steady state period differed by only 0.00 +/- 0.16 microg x ml-1 (P = 0.78) during the N2O and 0.00 +/- 0.25 microg x ml-1 (P = 0.91) during the Air trial. OAA/S scores and bispectral index values, as surrogate measures of pharmacodynamic effect, were not different during this time in either trial. The median(25th, 75th percentiles) of the median performance error (%) was -13 (-24, -1) during the N2O and -18 (-26, -9) during the Air trial. The median absolute performance error (%) was 17 (10, 24) in the N2O and 22 (12, 28) in Air trial. The divergence (%/h) was -10 (-26, 4) in the N2O and 14 (-21, 26) in Air trial. The wobble was 7 (5, 10) in the N2O and 6 (4, 8) in the Air trial.
When tested with venous blood samples, our TCI system for propofol, using a covariate-adjusted, integrated pharmacokinetic model to target effect-site concentrations, demonstrated a clinically acceptable accuracy and stability during mild to moderate sedation.
我们评估了一种新型的、集成的、协变量调整的靶控输注系统,该系统用于丙泊酚与50%氧化亚氮(N2O)联合镇静以及仅使用丙泊酚(空气)镇静的情况。
该方案包括在20名志愿者中进行连续15分钟的周期。在15分钟的对照期后,输注丙泊酚至初始靶效应室浓度0.25微克/毫升(N2O)或1.5微克/毫升(空气)。随后,靶效应室浓度在15分钟内分别增加0.25(N2O)或0.5微克/毫升(空气)。这个序列持续进行,直到志愿者根据观察者评估警觉/镇静(OAA/S)评分为2定义为失去意识。
在N2O试验中,伪稳态期开始(9分钟过去)和结束(15分钟过去)时的静脉血浆丙泊酚浓度仅相差0.00±0.16微克/毫升(P = 0.78),在空气试验中相差0.00±0.25微克/毫升(P = 0.91)。在这两个试验的这段时间内,作为药效学效应替代指标的OAA/S评分和脑电双频指数值没有差异。N2O试验期间,中位性能误差(%)的中位数(第25、75百分位数)为-13(-24,-1),空气试验期间为-18(-26,-9)。N2O试验中中位绝对性能误差(%)为17(10,24),空气试验中为22(12,28)。N2O试验中的偏差(%/小时)为-10(-26,4),空气试验中为14(-21,26)。N2O试验中的摆动为7(5,10),空气试验中为6(4,8)。
当用静脉血样进行测试时,我们的丙泊酚靶控输注系统使用协变量调整的集成药代动力学模型来靶向效应室浓度,在轻度至中度镇静期间显示出临床上可接受的准确性和稳定性。