Farley T A, Pomputius P F, Sabella W, Helgerson S D, Hadler J L
Department of Health Services, Hartford, CT.
Conn Med. 1991 Jan;55(1):15-8.
To measure the effect of school-based education on adolescents' AIDS knowledge and attitudes, we conducted surveys in two high schools and compared them to a baseline survey conducted in the same schools the previous year. One month before the follow-up survey, students in one of the two schools (the intervention school) had received a two-day education program about AIDS; students in the other (control) school had received no specific AIDS education. Students in both schools showed increases in AIDS knowledge between the baseline and follow-up surveys. Students in the intervention school were more likely than students in the control school to answer questions correctly about the safety of blood donation (82% vs 73%) and the possibility of HIV transmission from a former intravenous drug user (85% vs 67%); they were also less likely than students in the control school to believe persons with AIDS should have certain restriction on their activities. We conclude that while students' level of knowledge about AIDS and HIV has been improving over time even without intervention, specific education programs can still transmit important information, including information that is necessary to prevent or change risky behaviors.
为了衡量学校教育对青少年艾滋病知识和态度的影响,我们在两所高中进行了调查,并将其与前一年在同一学校进行的基线调查进行比较。在随访调查前一个月,两所学校中的一所(干预学校)的学生接受了为期两天的艾滋病教育课程;另一所(对照)学校的学生没有接受过特定的艾滋病教育。两所学校的学生在基线调查和随访调查之间艾滋病知识均有所增加。干预学校的学生比对照学校的学生更有可能正确回答关于献血安全性(82%对73%)以及从前静脉吸毒者传播艾滋病毒可能性(85%对67%)的问题;他们也比对照学校的学生更不太可能认为艾滋病患者在活动方面应受到某些限制。我们得出结论,虽然即使没有干预,学生对艾滋病和艾滋病毒的知识水平也一直在随着时间的推移而提高,但特定的教育项目仍然可以传播重要信息,包括预防或改变危险行为所需的信息。