Suppr超能文献

比较视角下的清洗:政治压力下科学界的排除与纳入规则

Purges in comparative perspective: Rules for exclusion and inclusion in the scientific community under political pressure.

作者信息

Beyler Richard, Kojevnikov Alexei, Wang Jessica

机构信息

History Department, Portland State University. P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207, USA.

出版信息

Osiris. 2005;20:23-48. doi: 10.1086/649412.

Abstract

During the intense political upheaval that dominated the middle decades of the twentieth century, modern states intensified their drives to discipline broad sectors of society and ensure their political reliability. Subjected to such pressures, scientific institutions faced the challenge of admitting new, officially mandated criteria into the regulation of scientific life. We examine the effects of these policies on the Kaiser Wilhelm Society in National Socialist Germany, the Max Planck Society in occupied Germany after 1945, the USSR Academy of Sciences throughout the Stalin era, and the National Academy of Sciences in early cold war America. In all these cases, while academic elites largely accepted the required radical changes in the rules for membership in the scientific community, they also sought to manipulate the process to their own institutional advantage.

摘要

在二十世纪中叶占据主导地位的激烈政治动荡期间,现代国家加大了对社会广泛领域进行管控的力度,并确保其政治可靠性。在这种压力下,科研机构面临着将新的官方规定标准纳入科学活动管理的挑战。我们考察了这些政策对纳粹德国时期的威廉皇帝学会、1945年后被占领德国的马克斯·普朗克学会、整个斯大林时代的苏联科学院以及冷战初期美国的国家科学院的影响。在所有这些案例中,虽然学术精英在很大程度上接受了科学界成员规则所需的激进变革,但他们也试图操纵这一过程以谋取自身机构的利益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验