Suppr超能文献

种植体周围炎的机械非手术治疗:一项单盲随机纵向临床研究。II. 微生物学结果。

Mechanical non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a single-blinded randomized longitudinal clinical study. II. Microbiological results.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Jun;37(6):563-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01561.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peri-implantitis is common in patients with dental implants. We performed a single-blinded longitudinal randomized study to assess the effects of mechanical debridement on the peri-implant microbiota in peri-implantitis lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An expanded checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization assay encompassing 79 different microorganisms was used to study bacterial counts before and during 6 months following mechanical treatment of peri-implantitis in 17 cases treated with curettes and 14 cases treated with an ultrasonic device. Statistics included non-parametric tests and GLM multivariate analysis with p<0001 indicating significance and 80% power.

RESULTS

At selected implant test sites, the most prevalent bacteria were: Fusobacterium nucleatum sp., Staphylococci sp., Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Helicobacter pylori, and Tannerella forsythia. 30 min. after treatment with curettes, A. actinomycetemcomitans (serotype a), Lactobacillus acidophilus, Streptococcus anginosus, and Veillonella parvula were found at lower counts (p<0.001). No such differences were found for implants treated with the ultrasonic device. Inconsistent changes occurred following the first week. No microbiological differences between baseline and 6-month samples were found for any species or between treatment study methods in peri-implantitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Both methods failed to eliminate or reduce bacterial counts in peri-implantitis. No group differences were found in the ability to reduce the microbiota in peri-implantitis.

摘要

背景

种植体周围炎在种植体患者中很常见。我们进行了一项单盲纵向随机研究,以评估机械清创术对种植体周围炎病变中种植体周围微生物群的影响。

材料和方法

使用扩展的 checkerboard DNA-DNA 杂交分析,包括 79 种不同的微生物,在 17 例使用刮匙治疗和 14 例使用超声设备治疗的种植体周围炎患者中,在机械治疗后的 6 个月内研究细菌计数。统计包括非参数检验和 GLM 多变量分析,p<0001 表示具有统计学意义,80%的功效。

结果

在选定的种植体测试部位,最常见的细菌是:核梭杆菌、葡萄球菌、伴放线放线杆菌、幽门螺杆菌和福赛坦纳氏菌。在用刮匙治疗 30 分钟后,A. actinomycetemcomitans(血清型 a)、嗜酸乳杆菌、咽峡炎链球菌和小韦荣球菌的计数较低(p<0.001)。使用超声设备治疗的种植体则未发现此类差异。在第一周后出现不一致的变化。在种植体周围炎的任何物种或治疗研究方法之间,基线和 6 个月样本之间均未发现微生物学差异。

结论

两种方法均未能消除或减少种植体周围炎中的细菌计数。在减少种植体周围炎微生物群方面,两种方法之间没有发现组间差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验