Suppr超能文献

一项针对严重残疾多发性硬化症患者的荷兰患者倡导个案管理干预措施有效性的随机对照试验(RCT)设计。

Design of a Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) on the effectiveness of a Dutch patient advocacy case management intervention among severely disabled Multiple Sclerosis patients.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 May 27;10:142. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-142.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Case management has been suggested as an innovative strategy that facilitates the improvement of a patient's quality of life, reduction of hospital length of stay, optimization of self-care and improvement of satisfaction of patients and professionals involved. However, there is little evidence about the effectiveness of the patient advocacy case management model in clinical practice.Therefore, the objective of our study was to examine the effects of the Dutch patient advocacy case management model for severely disabled Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients and their caregivers compared to usual care.

METHODS/DESIGN: In this randomized controlled trial the effectiveness of casemanagement on quality of life of patients and their caregivers, quality of care, service use and economic aspects were evaluated. The primary outcomes of this study were quality of life of MS-patients and caregiver burden of caregivers.Furthermore, we examined quality of life of caregivers, quality of care, service use and costs.

DISCUSSION

This is a unique trial in which we examined the effectiveness of case management from a broad perspective. We meticulously prepared this study and applied important features and created important conditions for both intervention and research protocol to increase the likelihood of finding evidence for the effectiveness of patient advocacy case management. Concerning the intervention we anticipated to five important conditions: 1) the contrast between the case management intervention compared to the usual care seems to be large enough to detect intervention effects; 2) we included patients with complex care situations and/or were at risk for critical situations; 3) the case managers were familiar with disease specific health-problems and a broad spectrum of solutions; 4) case managers were competent and authorized to perform a medical neurological examination and worked closely with neurologists specialized in MS; and 5) the case managers had a regional network of professionals and health care organisations at their disposal, and were accepted as a coordinator of care. We also put a lot of effort on the selection of eligible patients, randomization and statistical methods, but also on power analysis, selection of reliable, validated and sensitive outcome measures, and (statistical) control of confounders.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Dutch Trial Register http://www.trialregister.nl. Trial ID: NTR762.

摘要

背景

病例管理已被提议作为一种创新策略,可促进改善患者的生活质量、缩短住院时间、优化自我护理并提高患者和相关专业人员的满意度。然而,关于病例管理模式在临床实践中的有效性的证据很少。因此,我们的研究目的是检验荷兰患者倡导型病例管理模式对严重残疾多发性硬化症(MS)患者及其护理人员的效果,与常规护理相比。

方法/设计:在这项随机对照试验中,评估了病例管理对患者和护理人员的生活质量、护理质量、服务利用和经济方面的影响。本研究的主要结果是 MS 患者的生活质量和护理人员的护理负担。此外,我们还检查了护理人员的生活质量、护理质量、服务利用和成本。

讨论

这是一项独特的试验,我们从广泛的角度检验了病例管理的有效性。我们精心准备了这项研究,并应用了重要的特征和创造了重要的条件,既为干预措施,也为研究方案,以增加找到病例管理有效性证据的可能性。关于干预措施,我们预计有五个重要条件:1)病例管理干预与常规护理之间的对比似乎足够大,可以检测到干预效果;2)我们纳入了具有复杂护理情况和/或处于危急情况风险的患者;3)病例管理人员熟悉特定疾病的健康问题和广泛的解决方案;4)病例管理人员有能力和授权进行医学神经学检查,并与专门从事 MS 的神经病学家密切合作;5)病例管理人员拥有可利用的专业人员和医疗保健组织的区域网络,并被接受为护理协调员。我们还在合格患者的选择、随机化和统计方法方面投入了大量精力,还在功效分析、可靠、验证和敏感的结果测量的选择,以及(统计)混杂因素的控制方面投入了大量精力。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册处http://www.trialregister.nl。试验 ID:NTR762。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1316/2890641/36f08aabc946/1472-6963-10-142-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验