Boots Lizzy Mm, de Vugt Marjolein E, Kempen Gertrudis Ijm, Verhey Frans Rj
Alzheimer Center Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neurosciences, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 13;20(7):e10017. doi: 10.2196/10017.
The benefits of electronic health support for dementia caregivers are increasingly recognized. Reaching caregivers of people with early-stage dementia could prevent high levels of burden and psychological problems in the later stages.
The current study evaluates the effectiveness of the blended care self-management program, Partner in Balance, compared to a control group.
A single-blind randomized controlled trial with 81 family caregivers of community-dwelling people with mild dementia was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to either the 8-week, blended care self-management Partner in Balance program (N=41) or a waiting-list control group (N=40) receiving usual care (low-frequent counseling). The program combines face-to-face coaching with tailored Web-based modules. Data were collected at baseline and after 8 weeks in writing by an independent research assistant who was blinded to the treatment. The primary proximal outcome was self-efficacy (Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale) and the primary distal outcome was symptoms of depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale). Secondary outcomes included mastery (Pearlin Mastery Scale), quality of life (Investigation Choice Experiments for the Preferences of Older People), and psychological complaints (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety and Perceived Stress Scale).
A significant increase in favor of the intervention group was demonstrated for self-efficacy (care management, P=.002; service use P=.001), mastery (P=.001), and quality of life (P=.032). Effect sizes were medium for quality of life (d=0.58) and high for self-efficacy care management and service use (d=0.85 and d=0.93, respectively) and mastery (d=0.94). No significant differences between the groups were found on depressive symptoms, anxiety, and perceived stress.
This study evaluated the first blended-care intervention for caregivers of people with early-stage dementia and demonstrated a significant improvement in self-efficacy, mastery, and quality of life after receiving the Partner in Balance intervention, compared to a waiting-list control group receiving care as usual. Contrary to our expectations, the intervention did not decrease symptoms of depression, anxiety, or perceived stress. However, the levels of psychological complaints were relatively low in the study sample. Future studies including long-term follow up could clarify if an increase in self-efficacy results in a decrease or prevention of increased stress and depression. To conclude, the program can provide accessible preventative care to future generations of caregivers of people with early-stage dementia.
Netherlands Trial Register NTR4748; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=4748 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6vSb2t9Mg).
电子健康支持对痴呆症照料者的益处日益得到认可。为早期痴呆症患者的照料者提供支持可预防后期出现的高负担和心理问题。
本研究评估了混合式照护自我管理项目“平衡伙伴”相对于对照组的有效性。
对81名社区轻度痴呆症患者的家庭照料者进行了一项单盲随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到为期8周的混合式照护自我管理项目“平衡伙伴”组(N = 41)或接受常规护理(低频率咨询)的等待名单对照组(N = 40)。该项目将面对面指导与量身定制的网络模块相结合。由一名对治疗情况不知情的独立研究助理在基线时和8周后以书面形式收集数据。主要的近端结局是自我效能感(照料者自我效能量表),主要的远端结局是抑郁症状(流行病学研究中心抑郁量表)。次要结局包括掌控感(皮尔林掌控感量表)、生活质量(老年人偏好调查选择实验)和心理困扰(医院焦虑抑郁量表 - 焦虑和感知压力量表)。
干预组在自我效能感(护理管理,P = 0.002;服务使用,P = 0.001)、掌控感(P = 0.001)和生活质量(P = 0.032)方面有显著改善。生活质量的效应量为中等(d = 0.58),自我效能感护理管理和服务使用的效应量为高(分别为d = 0.85和d = 0.93),掌控感的效应量为高(d = 0.94)。两组在抑郁症状、焦虑和感知压力方面未发现显著差异。
本研究评估了首个针对早期痴呆症患者照料者的混合式照护干预措施,结果表明,与接受常规护理的等待名单对照组相比,接受“平衡伙伴”干预后,照料者的自我效能感、掌控感和生活质量有显著改善。与我们的预期相反,该干预措施并未减轻抑郁、焦虑或感知压力的症状。然而,研究样本中的心理困扰水平相对较低。未来包括长期随访的研究可以阐明自我效能感的提高是否会导致压力和抑郁的减轻或预防。总之,该项目可为未来早期痴呆症患者的照料者提供可及的预防性护理。
荷兰试验注册库NTR4748;http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=4748(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6vSb2t9Mg)