Neuropsychology and Applied Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Schizophr Res. 2010 Sep;122(1-3):185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.04.013. Epub 2010 May 26.
The current study examined characteristics of coping patterns adopted by college students in mainland China. In particular, it examined the coping strategies adopted by subjects with schizotypal personality (SPD) features compared to those without SPD features, and compared the relative effectiveness of their coping. Four types of coping flexibility were identified among the college sample (n=427), including active-inflexible, passive-inflexible, active-inconsistent, and passive-inconsistent styles. The passive-inconsistent style was related to the worst outcomes. When comparing subjects with SPD features with those without SPD features, subjects with SPD features endorsed significantly more emotion-focused strategies in uncontrollable situations than those without SPD features. The SPD group experienced higher levels of trait anxiety, depression, paranoid ideation and general health problems. The SPD group also generally perceived more, less controllable stress than the non-SPD group and randomly used all four categories of coping strategies.
本研究考察了中国大陆大学生应对模式的特点。特别是，它考察了具有分裂型人格特征（SPD）的受试者与没有 SPD 特征的受试者所采用的应对策略，并比较了他们应对策略的相对效果。在大学生样本（n=427）中确定了四种应对灵活性类型，包括积极不灵活、消极不灵活、积极不一致和消极不一致。消极不一致的风格与最糟糕的结果有关。当比较具有 SPD 特征的受试者与没有 SPD 特征的受试者时，具有 SPD 特征的受试者在不可控情况下比没有 SPD 特征的受试者更倾向于采用情绪聚焦策略。SPD 组表现出更高的特质焦虑、抑郁、偏执观念和一般健康问题。SPD 组通常比非 SPD 组感知到更多、更少可控的压力，并且随机使用所有四类应对策略。
