• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

代理人格特征和应对方式:它们与大学生特质焦虑的关系。

Agentic personality characteristics and coping: their relation to trait anxiety in college students.

机构信息

University of Akron.

Texas Tech University.

出版信息

Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2011 Apr;81(2):255-264. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2011.01094.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1939-0025.2011.01094.x
PMID:21486267
Abstract

Anxiety and its disorders, often present before adulthood, have high personal and societal costs for men and women. This study tested a mediation model in which 3 forms of coping mediate the relation of 3 agentic personality characteristics (i.e., traits associated with the belief that people can effectively exercise control over their lives) to lower levels of anxiety within 1 subgroup of young adults (i.e., college students). The agentic personality characteristics were (a) hardiness, (b) personal growth initiative, and (c) coping self-efficacy. The forms of dispositional coping were (a) problem-focused, (b) emotion-focused, and (c) avoidant. Results suggest that agentic personality characteristics differentially relate to forms of coping and trait anxiety. In addition, coping appears to fully mediate the relations of the personality characteristics to anxiety. The results imply that agentic personality characteristics and coping are important in decreasing and/or protecting against anxiety, in part because of how they relate to forms of coping, and suggest the need for more research.

摘要

焦虑及其障碍在成年前就经常出现,给男性和女性带来了很高的个人和社会成本。本研究测试了一个中介模型,其中 3 种应对方式中介了 3 种能动性人格特征(即与人们相信自己可以有效地控制自己生活的信念相关的特征)与 1 组年轻成年人(即大学生)中较低焦虑水平之间的关系。能动性人格特征包括(a)坚韧、(b)个人成长主动性和(c)应对自我效能感。特质应对方式包括(a)问题聚焦、(b)情绪聚焦和(c)回避。结果表明,能动性人格特征与应对方式和特质焦虑之间存在差异关系。此外,应对方式似乎完全中介了人格特征与焦虑之间的关系。研究结果表明,能动性人格特征和应对方式在降低和/或预防焦虑方面很重要,部分原因是它们与应对方式有关,并表明需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Agentic personality characteristics and coping: their relation to trait anxiety in college students.代理人格特征和应对方式:它们与大学生特质焦虑的关系。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2011 Apr;81(2):255-264. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2011.01094.x.
2
Late adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: the roles of coping style, self-esteem, and personality pathology.青少年后期非自杀性自伤:应对方式、自尊和人格病理的作用。
J Pers Disord. 2011 Dec;25(6):765-81. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.6.765.
3
COVID-19 stressful life events and mental health: Personality and coping styles as moderators.新冠疫情带来的生活应激事件与心理健康:人格特质和应对方式的调节作用。
J Am Coll Health. 2024 May-Jun;72(4):1068-1077. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2066977. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
4
Self-compassion as mediator between coping and social anxiety in late adolescence: A longitudinal analysis.自我同情在青少年晚期应对方式和社交焦虑之间的中介作用:一项纵向分析。
J Adolesc. 2019 Oct;76:120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.08.013. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
5
Anxiety and depression in alcohol use disorder individuals: the role of personality and coping strategies.酒精使用障碍个体中的焦虑和抑郁:人格和应对策略的作用。
Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(9):1475-1484. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1586950. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
6
Relationship among psychological capital, coping style and anxiety of Chinese college students.中国大学生心理资本、应对方式与焦虑的关系。
Riv Psichiatr. 2019 Nov-Dec;54(6):264-268. doi: 10.1708/3281.32545.
7
Heterogeneous patterns of stress over the four years of college: associations with anxious attachment and ego-resiliency.大学四年压力的异质模式:与焦虑型依恋和自我韧性的关系。
J Pers. 2013 Oct;81(5):476-86. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12010. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
8
Coping flexibility in young adults: comparison between subjects with and without schizotypal personality features.年轻人的应对灵活性:有和无精神分裂型人格特征者的比较。
Schizophr Res. 2010 Sep;122(1-3):185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.04.013. Epub 2010 May 26.
9
Coping, family social support, and psychological symptoms among student veterans.学生退伍军人的应对方式、家庭社会支持与心理症状
J Couns Psychol. 2015 Apr;62(2):242-52. doi: 10.1037/cou0000061. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
10
Mediation by illness perceptions of the effect of personality and health threat communication on coping with the diagnosis of diabetes.疾病认知对人格和健康威胁沟通对糖尿病诊断应对的影响的中介作用。
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Sep;15(Pt 3):623-42. doi: 10.1348/135910709X478664. Epub 2009 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Personal growth initiative: confirmatory factor analysis, gender invariance, and external validity of the Persian version.个人成长主动性:波斯语版本的验证性因素分析、性别不变性及外部效度
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 16;16:1576783. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1576783. eCollection 2025.
2
Perspectives of Nurses and Adolescents About Pro Re Nata Treatment in Adolescent Inpatient Psychiatric Units: A Qualitative Study.护士与青少年对青少年住院精神科按需治疗的看法:一项定性研究
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Oct;32(5):1148-1158. doi: 10.1111/jpm.70011. Epub 2025 Jul 10.
3
The associations between PTSD symptoms, intolerance of uncertainty and personal growth initiative in trauma-exposed children and adolescents: undirected and Bayesian network analyses.
创伤暴露儿童和青少年中创伤后应激障碍症状、不确定性不耐受与个人成长主动性之间的关联:无向和贝叶斯网络分析
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1007/s00787-025-02761-2.
4
Developmental Trajectory of Depressive Symptoms among Left-behind Children in Rural China: The Roles of Family Adversity and Personal Growth Initiative.中国农村留守儿童抑郁症状的发展轨迹:家庭逆境与个人成长主动性的作用
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Feb;54(2):339-353. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02077-5. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
5
Factors correlated with personal growth initiative among college students: A meta-analysis.大学生个人成长主动性的相关因素:一项元分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 25;10(7):e28518. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28518. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
6
Parent-child relationship and problematic smartphone use among chinese adolescents: a moderated mediation model.中国青少年的亲子关系与问题性智能手机使用:一个有调节的中介模型
Curr Psychol. 2022 Aug 10:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03556-3.
7
Assigning Clinical Significance and Symptom Severity Using the Zung Scales: Levels of Misclassification Arising from Confusion between Index and Raw Scores.使用zung量表确定临床意义和症状严重程度:因指数得分与原始得分混淆导致的错误分类水平。
Depress Res Treat. 2018 Jan 21;2018:9250972. doi: 10.1155/2018/9250972. eCollection 2018.