Department of Educational Development and Research, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Dec;24(6):703-19. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 May 26.
This article presents lessons learnt from experiences with assessment of professional competence. Based on Miller's pyramid, a distinction is made between established assessment technology for assessing 'knows', 'knowing how' and 'showing how' and more recent developments in the assessment of (clinical) performance at the 'does' level. Some general lessons are derived from research of and experiences with the established assessment technology. Here, many paradoxes are revealed and empirical outcomes are often counterintuitive. Instruments for assessing the 'does' level are classified and described, and additional general lessons for this area of performance assessment are derived. These lessons can also be read as general principles of assessment (programmes) and may provide theoretical building blocks to underpin appropriate and state-of-the-art assessment practices.
本文介绍了从专业能力评估经验中吸取的教训。基于米勒金字塔，对评估“知道”、“知道怎么做”和“展示怎么做”的成熟评估技术以及评估（临床）表现“做得到”水平的最新进展进行了区分。从成熟评估技术的研究和经验中得出了一些一般性的经验教训。在这里，揭示了许多悖论，实证结果往往违反直觉。对评估“做得到”水平的工具进行了分类和描述，并得出了该绩效评估领域的其他一般性经验教训。这些经验教训也可以被视为评估（方案）的一般原则，并为支持适当和最先进的评估实践提供理论基础。
