Suppr超能文献

医学生录取中的互动能力——怎样才是一名“优秀的医生”?

Interactional competencies in medical student admission- what makes a "good medical doctor"?

作者信息

Fleck Leonie, Amelung Dorothee, Fuchs Anna, Mayer Benjamin, Escher Malvin, Listunova Lena, Schultz Jobst-Hendrik, Möltner Andreas, Schütte Clara, Wittenberg Tim, Schneider Isabella, Herpertz Sabine C

机构信息

Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2025 Apr;30(2):439-458. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10348-w. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

Abstract

Doctors' interactional competencies play a crucial role in patient satisfaction, well-being, and compliance. Accordingly, it is in medical schools' interest to select candidates with strong interactional abilities. While Multiple Mini Interviews (MMIs) provide a useful context to assess such abilities, the evaluation of candidate performance during MMIs is not always based on a solid theoretical framework. The newly developed selection procedure "Interactional Competencies - Medical Doctors (IC-MD)" uses an MMI circuit with five simulation patient scenarios and is rated based on the theoretically and empirically grounded construct of emotional availability. A first validation study with N = 70 first-semester medical students took place in 2021. In terms of convergent validity, IC-MD ratings showed strong correlations with simulation patients' satisfaction with the encounter (r =.57) but no association with emotional intelligence measures. IC-MD ratings were not related to high school performance or a cognitive student aptitude test, indicating divergent validity. Inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.63) and generalizability (Eρ = 0.64) were satisfactory. The IC-MD proved to be fair regarding participants' age and gender. Participants with prior work experience in healthcare outperformed those without such experience. Participant acceptance of the procedure were good. The IC-MD is a promising selection procedure capable of assessing interactional competencies relevant to the medical setting. Measures of interactional competencies can complement the use of cognitive selection criteria in medical student admission. The predictive validity of the IC-MD needs to be addressed in future studies.

摘要

医生的互动能力在患者满意度、幸福感和依从性方面起着至关重要的作用。因此,选拔具有较强互动能力的候选人符合医学院的利益。虽然多重迷你面试(MMIs)为评估此类能力提供了有用的情境,但MMIs期间对候选人表现的评估并不总是基于坚实的理论框架。新开发的选拔程序“互动能力——医生(IC-MD)”使用了一个包含五个模拟患者场景的MMI环节,并基于情感可及性这一理论和实证基础的结构进行评分。2021年对N = 70名医学专业大一学生进行了首次验证研究。在收敛效度方面,IC-MD评分与模拟患者对会面的满意度显示出强相关性(r = 0.57),但与情商测量无关。IC-MD评分与高中成绩或认知学生能力倾向测试无关,表明具有区分效度。评分者间信度(ICC = 0.63)和概化系数(Eρ = 0.64)令人满意。IC-MD在参与者的年龄和性别方面被证明是公平的。有医疗保健工作经验的参与者表现优于没有此类经验的参与者。参与者对该程序的接受度良好。IC-MD是一种有前景的选拔程序,能够评估与医疗环境相关的互动能力。互动能力的测量可以补充医学院学生录取中认知选拔标准的使用。IC-MD的预测效度需要在未来的研究中加以探讨。

相似文献

2
The utility of multiple mini-interviews: experience of a medical school.多次小型面试的效用:一所医学院的经验
Korean J Med Educ. 2017 Mar;29(1):7-14. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2017.48. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
3
Validity evidence for the Hamburg multiple mini-interview.汉堡多站式面试的有效性证据。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 May 14;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1208-0.

本文引用的文献

10
What's the Role of Time in Shared Decision Making?时间在共同决策中的作用是什么?
AMA J Ethics. 2020 May 1;22(5):E416-422. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.416.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验