Department of Surgery, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jun;210(6):901-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.028. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
Preoperative risk assessment is important yet inexact in older patients because physiologic reserves are difficult to measure. Frailty is thought to estimate physiologic reserves, although its use has not been evaluated in surgical patients. We designed a study to determine if frailty predicts surgical complications and enhances current perioperative risk models.
We prospectively measured frailty in 594 patients (age 65 years or older) presenting to a university hospital for elective surgery between July 2005 and July 2006. Frailty was classified using a validated scale (0 to 5) that included weakness, weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, and slowed walking speed. Patients scoring 4 to 5 were classified as frail, 2 to 3 were intermediately frail, and 0 to 1 were nonfrail. Main outcomes measures were 30-day surgical complications, length of stay, and discharge disposition. Multiple logistic regression (complications and discharge) and negative binomial regression (length of stay) were done to analyze frailty and postoperative outcomes associations.
Preoperative frailty was associated with an increased risk for postoperative complications (intermediately frail: odds ratio [OR] 2.06; 95% CI 1.18-3.60; frail: OR 2.54; 95% CI 1.12-5.77), length of stay (intermediately frail: incidence rate ratio 1.49; 95% CI 1.24-1.80; frail: incidence rate ratio 1.69; 95% CI 1.28-2.23), and discharge to a skilled or assisted-living facility after previously living at home (intermediately frail: OR 3.16; 95% CI 1.0-9.99; frail: OR 20.48; 95% CI 5.54-75.68). Frailty improved predictive power (p < 0.01) of each risk index (ie, American Society of Anesthesiologists, Lee, and Eagle scores).
Frailty independently predicts postoperative complications, length of stay, and discharge to a skilled or assisted-living facility in older surgical patients and enhances conventional risk models. Assessing frailty using a standardized definition can help patients and physicians make more informed decisions.
在老年患者中,术前风险评估很重要但并不精确,因为生理储备很难衡量。虚弱被认为可以估计生理储备,尽管它在手术患者中的应用尚未得到评估。我们设计了一项研究,以确定虚弱是否预测手术并发症并增强当前的围手术期风险模型。
我们前瞻性地测量了 2005 年 7 月至 2006 年 7 月期间在一所大学医院接受择期手术的 594 名(年龄 65 岁或以上)患者的虚弱程度。使用经过验证的量表(0 至 5 分)对虚弱进行分类,该量表包括虚弱、体重减轻、疲惫、低体力活动和行走速度减慢。评分 4 至 5 分的患者被归类为虚弱,评分 2 至 3 分的患者为中度虚弱,评分 0 至 1 分的患者为非虚弱。主要结局指标为 30 天手术并发症、住院时间和出院去向。进行多项逻辑回归(并发症和出院)和负二项回归(住院时间)分析虚弱与术后结果的关联。
术前虚弱与术后并发症风险增加相关(中度虚弱:比值比 [OR] 2.06;95%CI 1.18-3.60;虚弱:OR 2.54;95%CI 1.12-5.77)、住院时间(中度虚弱:发病率比 1.49;95%CI 1.24-1.80;虚弱:发病率比 1.69;95%CI 1.28-2.23)和从以前居住在家庭转移到熟练或辅助生活设施(中度虚弱:OR 3.16;95%CI 1.0-9.99;虚弱:OR 20.48;95%CI 5.54-75.68)。虚弱改善了每个风险指数(即美国麻醉医师协会、李和鹰评分)的预测能力(p < 0.01)。
虚弱独立预测老年手术患者术后并发症、住院时间和转移到熟练或辅助生活设施,并增强了传统的风险模型。使用标准化定义评估虚弱可以帮助患者和医生做出更明智的决策。