Suppr超能文献

美国疼痛管理护理学会的角色界定研究。

Role delineation study for the American Society for Pain Management Nursing.

作者信息

Willens Joyce S, DePascale Christine, Penny James

机构信息

College of Nursing, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Pain Manag Nurs. 2010 Jun;11(2):68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2010.03.010.

Abstract

A role delineation study, or job analysis, is a necessary step in the development of a quality credentialing program. The process requires a logical approach and systematic methods to have an examination that is legally defensible. There are three main phases: initial development and evaluation, validation study, and development of test specifications. In the first phase, the content expert panel discussed performance domains that exist in pain management nursing. The six domains developed were: 1) assessment, monitoring, and evaluation of pain; 2) pharmacologic pain management; 3) nonpharmacologic pain management; 4) therapeutic communication and counseling; 5) patient and family teaching; and 6) collaborative and organizational activities. The panel then produced a list of 70 task statements to develop an online survey which was sent to independent reviewers with expertise in pain management nursing. After the panel reviewed the results of the pilot test, it was decided to clarify a few items that did not perform as expected. After the questionnaire was finalized it was distributed to 1,500 pain management nurses. The final yield was 585 usable returns, for a response rate of 39%. Thirty-three percent of the respondents reported a bachelor's degree in nursing as the highest degree awarded. Over 80% indicated that they were certified in pain management. Over 35% reported working in a staff position, 14% as a nurse practitioner, and 13% as a clinical nurse specialist. Part of the questionnaire asked the participants to rate performance expectation, consequence or the likelihood that the newly certified pain management nurse could cause harm, and the frequency of how often that nurse performs in each of the performance domains. The performance expectation was rated from 0 (the newly certified pain management nurse was not at all expected to perform the domain task) to 2 (after 6 months the newly certified pain management nurse would be expected to perform the domain task). The consequences of the degree would be the inability of the newly certified pain management nurse to perform duties or tasks in each domain was rated from 0 (no harm) to 4 (extreme harm). The first domain received the highest average frequency rating. The pharmacologic domain received the highest mean rating on consequence. The reliability of all scales was 0.95 or higher, which indicated that the questionnaire consistently measured what it was intended to measure. The quality of the questionnaire is an indicator that certification is one measure of nursing excellence.

摘要

角色界定研究,即工作分析,是制定高质量认证计划的必要步骤。该过程需要采用合乎逻辑的方法和系统的手段,以使考试具有法律依据。主要有三个阶段:初步开发与评估、验证研究以及考试规范制定。在第一阶段,内容专家小组讨论了疼痛管理护理中存在的绩效领域。所确定的六个领域分别为:1)疼痛评估、监测与评价;2)药物性疼痛管理;3)非药物性疼痛管理;4)治疗性沟通与咨询;5)患者及家属教育;6)协作与组织活动。随后,专家小组列出了70条任务陈述,以开展在线调查,并将其发送给具有疼痛管理护理专业知识的独立评审员。在专家小组审查了预测试结果后,决定对一些未达预期的项目进行澄清。问卷定稿后,分发给了1500名疼痛管理护士。最终收回有效问卷585份,回复率为39%。33%的受访者报告称其最高学历为护理学学士学位。超过80%的人表示他们拥有疼痛管理方面的认证。超过35%的人报告担任普通护士职位,14%为执业护士,13%为临床护理专家。问卷的一部分要求参与者对绩效期望、后果或新获得认证的疼痛管理护士可能造成伤害的可能性,以及该护士在每个绩效领域的执行频率进行评分。绩效期望的评分从0(完全不期望新获得认证的疼痛管理护士执行该领域任务)到2(6个月后期望新获得认证的疼痛管理护士执行该领域任务)。新获得认证的疼痛管理护士在每个领域无法履行职责或任务的后果评分从0(无伤害)到4(极其严重的伤害)。第一个领域的平均频率评分最高。药物性领域的后果平均评分最高。所有量表的信度均为0.95或更高,这表明问卷能够始终如一地测量其预期测量的内容。问卷的质量表明认证是衡量护理卓越程度的一项指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验